玻璃化
低温保护剂
低温保存
二甲基亚砜
卵巢组织冷冻保存
低温生物学
男科
甘油
生物
化学
医学
保持生育能力
胚胎
生物化学
生育率
人口
环境卫生
有机化学
细胞生物学
作者
Taynná El Cury-Silva,Monique Ellen Gervásio Nunes,Maíra Casalechi,Fábio Vasconcellos Comim,Jhenifer Kliemchen Rodrigues,Fernando M. Reis
出处
期刊:Cryobiology
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2021-08-08
卷期号:103: 7-14
被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.08.001
摘要
Studies on the cryopreservation of ovarian tissue usually compare slow freezing versus vitrification and aim to optimize protocols, evaluate combinations or concentrations of cryoprotectant agents (CPAs), exposure time, and the addition of synthetic polymers. This systematic review aimed to identify the different CPAs used for the vitrification of human or primate ovarian tissue and to compare their results in terms of follicular survival and functional preservation. We searched Pubmed and EMBASE for randomized clinical trials or cohort studies comparing CPAs for human and/or primate ovarian vitrification. The highest rate of morphologically normal follicles after cryopreservation was 98% and was obtained with a combination of 27% ethylene glycol (EG) plus 27% glycerol, in addition to non-permeable synthetic polymers. The use of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in relatively low concentrations combined with EG and other CPAs yielded more than 90% of intact follicles after vitrification. The methods and outcomes varied largely among studies, making it difficult to combine their results. While there is no definite answer to what is the best combination of CPAs for vitrification of human ovarian tissue, the data reviewed here suggest that current vitrification techniques are able to preserve the integrity of most follicles.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI