医学
内镜超声
不利影响
内窥镜检查
活检
内科学
放射科
普通外科
作者
Antonio Facciorusso,Bojan Kovacevic,Dennis Yang,Filipe Vilas‐Boas,Belén Martínez‐Moreno,Serena Stigliano,Gianenrico Rizzatti,M. Sacco,Martha Arevalo-Mora,Leonardo Villarreal-Sanchez,Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi,Laura Bernardoni,Armando Gabbrielli,Luca Barresi,Paraskevas Gkolfakis,Carlos Robles‐Medranda,Claudio De Angelis,Alberto Larghi,Francesco Maria Di Matteo,José Ramón Aparicio
出处
期刊:Endoscopy
[Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
日期:2022-04-21
卷期号:54 (12): 1158-1168
被引量:77
摘要
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy (TTNB) of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is associated with a non-negligible risk for adverse events (AEs). We aimed to identify the hierarchic interaction among independent predictors for TTNB-related AEs and to generate a prognostic model using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). PATIENTS AND METHODS : Multicenter retrospective analysis of 506 patients with PCLs who underwent TTNB. RPA of predictors for AEs was performed and the model was validated by means of bootstrap resampling. RESULTS : Mean cysts size was 36.7 mm. Most common diagnoses were intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN, 45 %), serous cystadenoma (18.8 %), and mucinous cystadenoma (12.8 %). Fifty-eight (11.5 %) AEs were observed. At multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 1.09-2.14; p = 0.05), number of TTNB passes (OR from 2.17, 1.32-4.34 to OR 3.16, 2.03-6.34 with the increase of the number of passes), complete aspiration of the cyst (OR 0.56, 0.31-0.95; p = 0.02), and diagnosis of IPMN (OR 4.16, 2.27-7.69; p < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of AEs, as confirmed by logistic regression and random forest analyses. RPA identified three risk classes: high-risk (IPMN sampled with multiple microforceps passes, 28 % AEs rate), low-risk (1.4 % AE rate, including patients < 64 years with other-than-IPMN diagnosis sampled with ≤ 2 microforceps passes and with complete aspiration of the cyst) and middle-risk class (6.1 % AEs rate, including the remaining patients). CONCLUSION : TTNB should be selectively used in the evaluation of patients with IPMN. The present model could be applied during patient selection as to optimize the benefit/risk of TTNB.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI