Reverse or Hemi Shoulder Arthroplasty in Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Single-Blinded Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

To compare outcomes between hemiarthroplasty (HA) and reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) as a treatment for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population.Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.Three Level-1 trauma centers.This study included 31 patients of which 14 were randomized into the HA group and 17 into the RSA group.Patients randomized to the HA group were treated with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture HA and patients randomized to the RSA group with a cemented-stem Aequalis-fracture RSA.Primary outcomes consisted of range of motion and constant score. Secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale for pain, DASH score, SF-12 scores, and radiographic outcomes.After 6 and 12 months of follow-up, RSA showed a significant higher anterior elevation (105 degrees vs. 80 degrees, P = 0.002 and 110 degrees vs. 90 degrees, P = 0.02, respectively) and constant score (60 vs. 41, P = 0.01 and 51 vs. 32, P = 0.05, respectively) compared with HA. There were no significant differences in external and internal rotation. Also, visual analog scale pain, DASH scores, SF-12 scores, and radiological healing of the tuberosities and heterotopic ossification did not show any significant differences between groups.RSA showed significant superior functional outcomes for anterior elevation and constant score compared with HA for dislocated 3-part and 4-part proximal humerus fractures after short-term follow-up.Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.