Brief Cognitive Tests for Distinguishing Clinical Alzheimer-Type Dementia From Mild Cognitive Impairment or Normal Cognition in Older Adults With Suspected Cognitive Impairment

痴呆 认知 医学 认知测验 口语流利性测试 召回 数据提取 认知障碍 蒙特利尔认知评估 临床心理学 神经心理学 听力学 精神科 梅德林 心理学 疾病 内科学 认知心理学 法学 政治学
作者
Laura S Hemmy,Eric J. Linskens,Pombie C. Silverman,Margaret A. Miller,Kristine Mc Talley,Brent C. Taylor,Jeannine Ouellette,Nancy Greer,Timothy J Wilt,Mary Butler,Howard A Fink
出处
期刊:Annals of Internal Medicine [American College of Physicians]
卷期号:172 (10): 678-687 被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.7326/m19-3889
摘要

Background: The accuracy and harms of brief cognitive tests for identifying clinical Alzheimer-type dementia (CATD) are uncertain. Purpose: To summarize evidence on accuracy and harms of brief cognitive tests for CATD in older adults with suspected cognitive impairment. Data Sources: Electronic bibliographic databases (from inception to November 2019) and systematic review bibliographies. Study Selection: English-language, controlled observational studies in older adults that evaluated the accuracy of brief cognitive tests (standalone tests; memory, executive function, and language tests; and brief multidomain batteries) for distinguishing CATD from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or normal cognition as defined by established diagnostic criteria. Studies with low or medium risk of bias (ROB) were analyzed. Data Extraction: Two reviewers rated ROB. One reviewer extracted data; the other verified extraction accuracy. Data Synthesis: Fifty-seven studies met analysis criteria. Many brief, single cognitive tests were highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing CATD from normal cognition. These included standalone tests (clock-drawing test, median sensitivity 0.79 and specificity 0.88 [8 studies]; Mini-Mental State Examination, 0.88 and 0.94 [7 studies]; Montreal Cognitive Assessment, 0.94 and 0.94 [2 studies]; and Brief Alzheimer Screen, 0.92 and 0.97 [1 study]), memory tests (list delayed recall, 0.89 and 0.94 [5 studies]), and language tests (category fluency, 0.92 and 0.89 [9 studies]). Accuracy was lower in distinguishing mild CATD from normal cognition and distinguishing CATD from MCI. No studies reported on testing harms. Limitations: Studies were small. Few test metrics were evaluated by multiple studies. Few studies directly compared different tests, scores, cut points, or test combinations. Conclusion: Many brief, single cognitive tests accurately distinguish CATD from normal cognition in older adults but are less accurate in distinguishing mild CATD from normal cognition or CATD from MCI. No studies reported on testing harms. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (PROSPERO: CRD42018117897)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
huanfid完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
从容芮应助小宁xiaon小宁采纳,获得10
刚刚
邓德亨卓汲完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
桐桐应助gfreezer采纳,获得10
2秒前
十三完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xiaoyu完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
李爱国应助琅千袭采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
月不笑发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
粉色小妖精完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
蒲公英的约定完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
儒雅以云完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
shamy夫妇完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
manmanbuman发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
孤海未蓝完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
xiaoblue完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
积极的未来完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
汐颜完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
郁盈发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
SOLOMON应助liuyannong采纳,获得10
14秒前
fufuya完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
活力听兰完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Daisy完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
Vicky发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
wanci应助刘浩然采纳,获得10
16秒前
617499818完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
JamesPei应助月不笑采纳,获得10
18秒前
chemier027完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
穆亦擎完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
gfreezer发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
瓶子完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
啊算法撒旦F完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
简单花花完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
太叔山柳完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
manmanbuman完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
lalala完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
MiaJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
Gummy完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
高分求助中
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
The three stars each: the Astrolabes and related texts 500
Revolutions 400
Diffusion in Solids: Key Topics in Materials Science and Engineering 400
Phase Diagrams: Key Topics in Materials Science and Engineering 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2451569
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2124566
关于积分的说明 5406342
捐赠科研通 1853335
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 921734
版权声明 562273
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 493051