病菌
谷胱甘肽
免疫学
医学
抗原
随机对照试验
心脏外科
外科
生物
生物化学
酶
作者
Philip J. Norris,Mars Stone,Clara Di Germanio,Brendan G. Balasko,Zhanna Kaidarova,Henry Friend,Jeanne Varrone,Laurence Corash,Nina Mufti,Richard J. Benjamin
出处
期刊:Transfusion
[Wiley]
日期:2025-01-13
卷期号:65 (3): 459-465
摘要
Abstract Background Although alloimmunization risk of pathogen‐reduced (PR) platelets has been studied, the risk has not been reported with PR red blood cells (RBCs). Study Design and Methods In a Phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Red Cell Pathogen Inactivation), cardiac or thoracic‐aorta surgery patients were randomized to transfusion with amustaline/glutathione PR versus conventional RBCs. Pre‐transfusion and Day 28 samples were evaluated for Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I and Class II antibodies at low, medium, and high cutoff values. Results The HLA alloimmunization analysis included 114 participants (53% female) in the PR and 113 (51% female) in the conventional RBC arms. In a modified intention‐to‐treat analysis, 13.7% ( N = 29) and 7.2% ( N = 15) developed new high‐level HLA Class I or Class II antibodies, respectively; however, there was no signal that PR‐RBCs affected the rate of HLA Class I (odds ratio (OR) 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–2.9]) or Class II antibody formation (OR 0.99 [95% CI 0.35–2.8]). Female transfusion recipients had higher risk of developing new high‐level HLA Class I antibodies (OR 12.0 [95% CI 3.5–40.9]) and Class II antibodies (OR 5.0 [95% CI 1.4–17]). The mean number of RBC (5.5 vs. 3.6 units, p = 0.018) and platelet (1.8 vs. 1.1 units, p = 0.043) transfusions was higher in subjects with new high‐level HLA Class II antibodies. Discussion Receipt of amustaline/glutathione PR‐RBC units did not affect HLA alloimmunization risk. Female sex and number of RBC and platelet transfusions were risk factors for the development of new high‐level HLA Class I and Class II antibodies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI