亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Lamotrigine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy

拉莫三嗪 医学 癫痫 不利影响 安慰剂 人口 临床试验 随机对照试验 内科学 精神科 替代医学 病理 环境卫生
作者
Mariangela Panebianco,Rebecca Bresnahan,Anthony G Marson
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier]
卷期号:2023 (12) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd001909.pub4
摘要

Background This is an updated version of a Cochrane Review last updated in 2020. Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, affecting 0.5% to 1% of the population. In nearly 30% of cases, epilepsy is resistant to currently available drugs. Pharmacological treatment remains the first choice to control epilepsy. Lamotrigine is a second‐generation antiseizure medication. When used as an add‐on (in combination with other antiseizure medications), lamotrigine can reduce seizures, but with some adverse effects. Objectives To evaluate the benefits and harms of add‐on lamotrigine, compared with add‐on placebo or no add‐on treatment in people with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy. Search methods For this update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid) on 3 October 2022 with no language restrictions. CRS Web includes randomised and quasi‐randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialised Registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including Epilepsy. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated add‐on lamotrigine versus add‐on placebo or no add‐on treatment in people of any age with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy. We used data from the first period of eligible cross‐over trials. Data collection and analysis For this update, two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data. Our primary outcome was 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Our secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal, adverse effects, cognitive effects, and quality of life. Primary analyses were by intention‐to‐treat. We performed sensitivity best‐ and worse‐case analyses to account for missing outcome data. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% Cls) for dichotomous outcomes. Main results We identified no new studies for this update, so the results and conclusions of the review are unchanged. We included five parallel‐group studies in adults or children, eight cross‐over studies in adults or children, and one parallel study with a responder‐enriched design in infants. In total, these 14 studies enroled 1806 eligible participants (38 infants, 199 children, 1569 adults). Baseline phases ranged from four to 12 weeks and treatment phases ranged from eight to 36 weeks. We rated 11 studies (1243 participants) at low overall risk of bias and three (697 participants) at unclear overall risk of bias due to lack of information on study design. Four studies (563 participants) reported effective blinding. Lamotrigine compared with placebo probably increases the likelihood of achieving 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.23; 12 trials, 1322 participants (adults and children); moderate‐certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in risk of treatment withdrawal for any reason among people treated with lamotrigine versus people treated with placebo (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.37; 14 trials; 1806 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Lamotrigine compared with placebo is probably associated with a greater risk of ataxia (RR 3.34, 99% Cl 2.01 to 5.55; 12 trials; 1525 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence), dizziness (RR 1.76, 99% Cl 1.28 to 2.43; 13 trials; 1768 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence), nausea (RR 1.81, 99% CI 1.22 to 2.68; 12 studies, 1486 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence), and diplopia (RR 3.79, 99% Cl 2.15 to 6.68; 3 trials, 944 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference in the risk of fatigue between lamotrigine and placebo (RR 0.82, 99% CI 0.55 to 1.22; 12 studies, 1552 participants; moderate‐certainty evidence). Authors' conclusions Lamotrigine as an add‐on treatment for drug‐resistant focal seizures is probably effective for reducing seizure frequency. Certain adverse effects (ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, and nausea) are probably more likely to occur with lamotrigine compared with placebo. There is probably little or no difference in the number of people who withdraw from treatment with lamotrigine versus placebo. The trials were of relatively short duration and provided no long‐term evidence. In addition, some trials had few participants. Further trials are needed to assess the long‐term effects of lamotrigine and to compare lamotrigine with other add‐on drugs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
23秒前
钮若翠发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
zhang完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
钮若翠完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
mumu发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
SOLOMON应助mumu采纳,获得20
1分钟前
1分钟前
褚青筠发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Gengen完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
hzb发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
容飞扬发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
爆米花应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
jimmy_bytheway完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
Orange应助......采纳,获得10
2分钟前
贪玩丸子完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
不知道吃什么完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
狸宝的小果子完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
谨慎的寒梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
斐然诗完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
yyyy发布了新的文献求助30
3分钟前
昊昊完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
酷波er应助飞快的雪瑶采纳,获得10
4分钟前
小马甲应助wmwm采纳,获得10
4分钟前
SOLOMON举报小兔瑞贝卡求助涉嫌违规
4分钟前
hanjunan完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
4分钟前
乔大开发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
乔大开完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
5分钟前
care完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
江湖小妖完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
酷波er应助容飞扬采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
Mike001发布了新的文献求助50
5分钟前
共享精神应助沫沫采纳,获得10
5分钟前
高分求助中
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
The three stars each : the Astrolabes and related texts 550
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 500
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2400619
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2100907
关于积分的说明 5296865
捐赠科研通 1828629
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 911454
版权声明 560297
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 487211