Abstract PO2-12-12: REaCT 5G: A randomized study comparing bone pain after 5 days of filgrastim or one day of pegfilgrastim for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 发热性中性粒细胞减少症 中性粒细胞减少症 骨痛 内科学 化疗 佐剂 外科
作者
Terry L. Ng,Y. Zhang,Carol Stober,Jennifer Shamess,Natalie Mills,Stuart G. Nicholls,Mohammed Ibrahim,Daniel Davoudpour,Christopher Armiento,Marie-France Savard,Moira Rushton,Arif Awan,Sandeep Sehdev,John Hilton,Xinni Song,Rakesh Goel,Fiona MacDonald,Kelly Daigle,Lisa Vandermeer,Monica Taljaard
出处
期刊:Cancer Research [American Association for Cancer Research]
卷期号:84 (9_Supplement): PO2-12 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-12-12
摘要

Abstract Background: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) such as filgrastim (FIL) or pegfilgrastim (PEG) significantly reduces the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and treatment-related hospitalization in patients with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, patients receiving G-CSF can experience clinically significant bone pain. Previous studies examining post-GCSF bone pain were mostly based on physician pain assessment and compared mixed doses (30/60/100 μg/kg) of PEG vs. FIL (5μg/kg/day or 300 μg/day) given for 7 to 14 days. Based on a randomized non-inferiority study, 5 days of FIL is considered non-inferior to 10 days of FIL to prevent FN and hospitalizations and is frequently used in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patient-reported bone pain after 5 days of FIL vs. single dose of PEG has never been compared in a prospective randomized study and has important implications for patient and physician treatment preferences. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label trial, patients receiving neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer requiring primary FN prophylaxis with G-CSF were randomized 1:1 to either 5 days of FIL (300 μg or 480μg if ≥ 90 kg) or 1 day of PEG (6 mg) with each cycle of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was bone pain using area under the curve (AUC) of the daily pain score from days 1-5 (AUC score 0 to 40) during cycle 1. We used linear regression adjusting for stratification factors [cancer center (2 centers) and chemotherapy regimen (taxane (TAX) or anthracycline (ANTH)-based during cycle 1] and prespecified baseline covariates: age, pain, and use of pain medications pre-chemotherapy. Supportive analysis of bone pain across cycles 1 to 4 was conducted using repeated linear regression. Key secondary endpoints included incidence of FN, hospitalizations, chemotherapy delay, dose-reduction or discontinuation, and chemotherapy-related deaths. Results: From June 2021 to March 2023, 233 patients were enrolled, with 217 patients (108 FIL/109 PEG) in the intention-to-treat analysis; 16 (7.4%) patients were excluded because of incomplete follow-up. Participants were mean age 55.6 years; almost exclusively female (99.1%), on chemotherapy regimen TAX 57% vs. ANTH 43%, had mean baseline pain score 1.12, and prevalence of pain medication use pre-chemotherapy was acetaminophen 14.7%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 6.0% and opioids 3.2%. Characteristics were balanced between arms (Table 1). After repeated measures linear regression adjusted for age, chemotherapy regimen, baseline pain, and use of pain medications pre-chemotherapy, mean AUC for bone pain at cycle 1 was 10.94 for FIL and 10.12 for PEG (mean difference 0.82; 95% CI: -1.59, 3.23; p = 0.516). There was no significant difference between arms across treatment cycles (interaction p = 0.785; mean time-averaged difference 0.28; 95% CI: -1.75, 2.32). Across cycles 1 to 4, mean peak pain over 5 days post-GCSF was 3.27 vs. 3.41 (p=0.700); frequency of bone pain during first 8 days (pain score > 0) was 52.5% vs. 51.3%; p=0.358, and mean frequency of severe pain (pain score ≥ 5) was 17.5% vs. 15.2%; p=0.014 for FIL vs. PEG, respectively. The incidence of FN [4.6% vs. 0%, absolute difference 4.6% (95% CI: -0.3%, 9.5%; p=0.069)] and hospitalization [FN and non-FN related: 10.2% vs. 1.8%, absolute difference of 8.4% (95% CI: 1.2%, 15.5%; p=0.021)] was higher in the FIL group. There were no significant differences in chemotherapy delay (13% vs. 11%; p=0.815), dose reduction (14.8% vs. 14.7%; p=0.999), early discontinuation (8.3% vs. 5.5%; p=0.580), or chemotherapy-related death (0.9% vs. 0%; p=0.996) in the FIL vs. PEG groups, respectively. Conclusion: There was no difference in patient-reported bone pain after 5 days of FIL or PEG, even after controlling for important clinical factors. Importantly, the study observed higher rates of FN and hospitalizations in patients receiving FIL for 5 days only. Table 1 Baseline Characteristics Citation Format: Terry Ng, Yuxin Zhang, Carol Stober, Jennifer Shamess, Natalie Mills, Stuart Nicholls, Mohammed Ibrahim, Daniel Davoudpour, Christopher Armiento, Marie-France Savard, Moira Rushton, Arif Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Xinni Song, Rakesh Goel, Fiona Macdonald, Kelly Daigle, Lisa Vandermeer, Monica Taljaard, Mark Clemons. REaCT 5G: A randomized study comparing bone pain after 5 days of filgrastim or one day of pegfilgrastim for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-12-12.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
weqhdgjfk完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
脑洞疼应助张茗瑄采纳,获得10
2秒前
762323661完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
kyeee_t发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
hailiangzheng完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
zzj完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
molihuakai应助一鸣大人采纳,获得10
5秒前
freemaisui完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
自信大白菜真实的钥匙完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
实验室的篮球运动员完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
无私绝音完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
反复发作完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
大仙完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
黄gakrpo发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
开朗的向日葵完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
kate完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
回家放羊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
无花果应助Betty采纳,获得10
9秒前
AAAAL完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
tszjw168发布了新的文献求助50
11秒前
caitlin完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
脑袋空空的姜姜硕完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
KK卮完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
5999完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
拼搏的似狮完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
甜美的柜子完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
牛马完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
roking完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
赶紧毕业完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
迅速采梦发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
秋风举报李里黎求助涉嫌违规
14秒前
玥月完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
体能行者完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Perfectionism in School: When Achievement Is not So Perfect 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7726520
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9278773
关于积分的说明 20128539
捐赠科研通 7303554
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3302167
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2455568
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2310118