亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Abstract PO2-12-12: REaCT 5G: A randomized study comparing bone pain after 5 days of filgrastim or one day of pegfilgrastim for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer

聚乙二醇非格司亭 菲格拉斯汀 医学 发热性中性粒细胞减少症 中性粒细胞减少症 骨痛 内科学 化疗 佐剂 外科
作者
Terry L. Ng,Y. Zhang,Carol Stober,Jennifer Shamess,Natalie Mills,Stuart G. Nicholls,Mohammed Ibrahim,Daniel Davoudpour,Christopher Armiento,Marie-France Savard,Moira Rushton,Arif Awan,Sandeep Sehdev,John Hilton,Xinni Song,Rakesh Goel,Fiona MacDonald,Kelly Daigle,Lisa Vandermeer,Monica Taljaard
出处
期刊:Cancer Research [American Association for Cancer Research]
卷期号:84 (9_Supplement): PO2-12 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-po2-12-12
摘要

Abstract Background: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) such as filgrastim (FIL) or pegfilgrastim (PEG) significantly reduces the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and treatment-related hospitalization in patients with early breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. However, patients receiving G-CSF can experience clinically significant bone pain. Previous studies examining post-GCSF bone pain were mostly based on physician pain assessment and compared mixed doses (30/60/100 μg/kg) of PEG vs. FIL (5μg/kg/day or 300 μg/day) given for 7 to 14 days. Based on a randomized non-inferiority study, 5 days of FIL is considered non-inferior to 10 days of FIL to prevent FN and hospitalizations and is frequently used in patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Patient-reported bone pain after 5 days of FIL vs. single dose of PEG has never been compared in a prospective randomized study and has important implications for patient and physician treatment preferences. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label trial, patients receiving neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer requiring primary FN prophylaxis with G-CSF were randomized 1:1 to either 5 days of FIL (300 μg or 480μg if ≥ 90 kg) or 1 day of PEG (6 mg) with each cycle of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was bone pain using area under the curve (AUC) of the daily pain score from days 1-5 (AUC score 0 to 40) during cycle 1. We used linear regression adjusting for stratification factors [cancer center (2 centers) and chemotherapy regimen (taxane (TAX) or anthracycline (ANTH)-based during cycle 1] and prespecified baseline covariates: age, pain, and use of pain medications pre-chemotherapy. Supportive analysis of bone pain across cycles 1 to 4 was conducted using repeated linear regression. Key secondary endpoints included incidence of FN, hospitalizations, chemotherapy delay, dose-reduction or discontinuation, and chemotherapy-related deaths. Results: From June 2021 to March 2023, 233 patients were enrolled, with 217 patients (108 FIL/109 PEG) in the intention-to-treat analysis; 16 (7.4%) patients were excluded because of incomplete follow-up. Participants were mean age 55.6 years; almost exclusively female (99.1%), on chemotherapy regimen TAX 57% vs. ANTH 43%, had mean baseline pain score 1.12, and prevalence of pain medication use pre-chemotherapy was acetaminophen 14.7%, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 6.0% and opioids 3.2%. Characteristics were balanced between arms (Table 1). After repeated measures linear regression adjusted for age, chemotherapy regimen, baseline pain, and use of pain medications pre-chemotherapy, mean AUC for bone pain at cycle 1 was 10.94 for FIL and 10.12 for PEG (mean difference 0.82; 95% CI: -1.59, 3.23; p = 0.516). There was no significant difference between arms across treatment cycles (interaction p = 0.785; mean time-averaged difference 0.28; 95% CI: -1.75, 2.32). Across cycles 1 to 4, mean peak pain over 5 days post-GCSF was 3.27 vs. 3.41 (p=0.700); frequency of bone pain during first 8 days (pain score > 0) was 52.5% vs. 51.3%; p=0.358, and mean frequency of severe pain (pain score ≥ 5) was 17.5% vs. 15.2%; p=0.014 for FIL vs. PEG, respectively. The incidence of FN [4.6% vs. 0%, absolute difference 4.6% (95% CI: -0.3%, 9.5%; p=0.069)] and hospitalization [FN and non-FN related: 10.2% vs. 1.8%, absolute difference of 8.4% (95% CI: 1.2%, 15.5%; p=0.021)] was higher in the FIL group. There were no significant differences in chemotherapy delay (13% vs. 11%; p=0.815), dose reduction (14.8% vs. 14.7%; p=0.999), early discontinuation (8.3% vs. 5.5%; p=0.580), or chemotherapy-related death (0.9% vs. 0%; p=0.996) in the FIL vs. PEG groups, respectively. Conclusion: There was no difference in patient-reported bone pain after 5 days of FIL or PEG, even after controlling for important clinical factors. Importantly, the study observed higher rates of FN and hospitalizations in patients receiving FIL for 5 days only. Table 1 Baseline Characteristics Citation Format: Terry Ng, Yuxin Zhang, Carol Stober, Jennifer Shamess, Natalie Mills, Stuart Nicholls, Mohammed Ibrahim, Daniel Davoudpour, Christopher Armiento, Marie-France Savard, Moira Rushton, Arif Awan, Sandeep Sehdev, John Hilton, Xinni Song, Rakesh Goel, Fiona Macdonald, Kelly Daigle, Lisa Vandermeer, Monica Taljaard, Mark Clemons. REaCT 5G: A randomized study comparing bone pain after 5 days of filgrastim or one day of pegfilgrastim for primary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-12-12.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
斯文败类应助坦率的尔冬采纳,获得10
4秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
Akim应助吾日三省吾身采纳,获得10
9秒前
jyy应助笑点低的翠绿采纳,获得10
11秒前
14秒前
寻道图强完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
19秒前
21秒前
minhdh完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
zzw18512467916完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
落寞的又菡完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
婼汐完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
ggp应助星工捷卫采纳,获得150
40秒前
GSH完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
积极的誉完成签到,获得积分10
44秒前
44秒前
Kristopher完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
47秒前
牛文豪发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
晴水完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
彭笑笑发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
哩哩完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
矜天完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
充电宝应助yxf采纳,获得10
1分钟前
NexusExplorer应助super采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
zizi完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Predation in the Hymenoptera: An Evolutionary Perspective 1800
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1561
Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd Edition 1200
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Beyond the sentence: discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Atlas of Liver Pathology: A Pattern-Based Approach 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5509257
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4604224
关于积分的说明 14489437
捐赠科研通 4538934
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2487224
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1469636
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1441882