作者
Maria Pabón,Orly Vardeny,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Akshay S. Desai,Brian Claggett,Ian J. Kulac,Pardeep S. Jhund,Carolyn S.P. Lam,Michele Senni,Sanjiv J. Shah,Adriaan A. Voors,Faı̈ez Zannad,Bertram Pitt,Clara Saldarriaga,Mark C. Petrie,Béla Merkely,Maria Borentain,Katharina Mueller,Prabhakar Viswanathan,Flaviana Amarante
摘要
Importance Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks. Objective To assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024. Intervention Participants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events. Results Of the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P = .39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher ( P for interaction = .36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%. Conclusions and Relevance In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626