Net effects of conservation agriculture principles on sustainable land use: A synthesis

保护性农业 耕作 农业 作物残渣 环境科学 免耕农业 农林复合经营 水土保持 常规耕作 地表径流 覆盖耕作 农学 作物产量 可持续农业 土壤水分 土壤科学 生态学 生物 土壤肥力
作者
Liangang Xiao,Nikolaus J. Kuhn,Rongqin Zhao,Lianhai Cao
出处
期刊:Global Change Biology [Wiley]
卷期号:27 (24): 6321-6330 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.1111/gcb.15906
摘要

Abstract Despite the strong recommendations from scientists, to till or not to till remains a confusing question for many farmers around the world due to the worries of crop yield decline and negative impacts on soils and environment. A confused understanding of the role of the individual principles of conservation agriculture significantly limits the effectiveness and applicability of soil conservation strategies and frameworks to achieve sustainable agriculture. By distinguishing clearly between the different principles of conservation agriculture, the net effects of no‐tillage on improving and sustaining agro‐ecosystems are analyzed based on 49 recent meta‐analyses in this study. The review shows that no‐tillage leads to a significant decline of crop yield (−8.0% to 10.0%, median: −1.9%), whereas residue retention represents the key driver for improving crop production (4.0%–28.0%, median: 8.2%). The efficacy of no‐tillage for water erosion control, especially runoff (−24.0% to −0.7%, median: −10.0%), is often insignificant and otherwise lower compared to residue retention (−87.0% to −14.0%, median: −45.5%). Soil carbon sequestration potential under conservation tillage is quite limited or even close to zero, and if any, it can likely be attributed to the associated residue retention (−0.1% to 12.8%, median: 9.7%) rather than no‐tillage (−2.0% to 10.0%, median: 4.8%). Our analysis illustrates that in conservation agriculture, no‐tillage as the original and central principle of soil management is often less effective than associated supplementary measures, in particular residue retention. Residue retention may therefore play a key role for achieving sustainable land use. An additional benefit of residue retention is the less dramatic change of farming practices compared to no‐tillage. The results of this review illustrate that a new framework for assessing the benefits of conservation practices has to be developed. To till, or not to till, is not the question: residue retention seems more critical.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Crw__完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
刚刚
2秒前
kekele发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
ding应助Yang_Yuting采纳,获得50
3秒前
嘿嘿嘿发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
共享精神应助yingying采纳,获得10
7秒前
121311发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
852应助学习中勿扰采纳,获得10
7秒前
幽默尔蓉发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
nenoaowu发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
围城烟火应助一个梦想采纳,获得10
9秒前
酷酷忆灵发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
面向杂志编论文应助566采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
NexusExplorer应助cc采纳,获得10
11秒前
嘿嘿嘿完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
13秒前
思源应助hwq采纳,获得10
13秒前
呆呆发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
songyang完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
18秒前
19秒前
jie应助初夏采纳,获得10
19秒前
dongjingran发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
21秒前
chcmuer发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
songyang发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
CodeCraft应助秋高气爽采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
呆呆完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
29秒前
30秒前
香蕉觅云应助安年采纳,获得10
31秒前
Archy完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
聂难敌发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
留胡子的书桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
高分求助中
【本贴是提醒信息,请勿应助】请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Challenges, Strategies, and Resiliency in Disaster and Risk Management 500
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2481682
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2144277
关于积分的说明 5469424
捐赠科研通 1866803
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 927830
版权声明 563039
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 496404