Net effects of conservation agriculture principles on sustainable land use: A synthesis

保护性农业 耕作 农业 作物残渣 环境科学 免耕农业 农林复合经营 水土保持 常规耕作 地表径流 覆盖耕作 农学 作物产量 可持续农业 农业工程 土壤水分 土壤科学 生态学 生物 工程类 土壤肥力
作者
Liangang Xiao,Nikolaus J. Kuhn,Rongqin Zhao,Lianhai Cao
出处
期刊:Global Change Biology [Wiley]
卷期号:27 (24): 6321-6330 被引量:53
标识
DOI:10.1111/gcb.15906
摘要

Abstract Despite the strong recommendations from scientists, to till or not to till remains a confusing question for many farmers around the world due to the worries of crop yield decline and negative impacts on soils and environment. A confused understanding of the role of the individual principles of conservation agriculture significantly limits the effectiveness and applicability of soil conservation strategies and frameworks to achieve sustainable agriculture. By distinguishing clearly between the different principles of conservation agriculture, the net effects of no‐tillage on improving and sustaining agro‐ecosystems are analyzed based on 49 recent meta‐analyses in this study. The review shows that no‐tillage leads to a significant decline of crop yield (−8.0% to 10.0%, median: −1.9%), whereas residue retention represents the key driver for improving crop production (4.0%–28.0%, median: 8.2%). The efficacy of no‐tillage for water erosion control, especially runoff (−24.0% to −0.7%, median: −10.0%), is often insignificant and otherwise lower compared to residue retention (−87.0% to −14.0%, median: −45.5%). Soil carbon sequestration potential under conservation tillage is quite limited or even close to zero, and if any, it can likely be attributed to the associated residue retention (−0.1% to 12.8%, median: 9.7%) rather than no‐tillage (−2.0% to 10.0%, median: 4.8%). Our analysis illustrates that in conservation agriculture, no‐tillage as the original and central principle of soil management is often less effective than associated supplementary measures, in particular residue retention. Residue retention may therefore play a key role for achieving sustainable land use. An additional benefit of residue retention is the less dramatic change of farming practices compared to no‐tillage. The results of this review illustrate that a new framework for assessing the benefits of conservation practices has to be developed. To till, or not to till, is not the question: residue retention seems more critical.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
槿曦完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
沉默洋葱完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
龙在天涯完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
俏皮的戎完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
安平完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ymxlcfc完成签到 ,获得积分0
8秒前
nn发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
abab小王发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
言_完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Lotus完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
fusheng完成签到 ,获得积分0
15秒前
Ellen完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
浮生完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
坚强小霸王完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
22秒前
阳光大山完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
超级的冷菱完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
多情的如冰完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
友好的擎关注了科研通微信公众号
25秒前
廖露完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
木木很累发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
Rachel完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
大猫不吃鱼完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
jiaaniu完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
仁爱听露完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
c落英缤纷完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
LingMg完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
shaohua2011完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
42秒前
朴实小海豚完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
可爱的石头完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
充电宝应助邵振启采纳,获得10
46秒前
开心的盼波完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
踏实的大地完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
www完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
高分求助中
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management 800
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6473905
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8276835
关于积分的说明 17647257
捐赠科研通 5554269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2909824
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1886615
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1738985