Net effects of conservation agriculture principles on sustainable land use: A synthesis

保护性农业 耕作 农业 作物残渣 环境科学 免耕农业 农林复合经营 水土保持 常规耕作 地表径流 覆盖耕作 农学 作物产量 可持续农业 农业工程 土壤水分 土壤科学 生态学 生物 工程类 土壤肥力
作者
Liangang Xiao,Nikolaus J. Kuhn,Rongqin Zhao,Lianhai Cao
出处
期刊:Global Change Biology [Wiley]
卷期号:27 (24): 6321-6330 被引量:53
标识
DOI:10.1111/gcb.15906
摘要

Abstract Despite the strong recommendations from scientists, to till or not to till remains a confusing question for many farmers around the world due to the worries of crop yield decline and negative impacts on soils and environment. A confused understanding of the role of the individual principles of conservation agriculture significantly limits the effectiveness and applicability of soil conservation strategies and frameworks to achieve sustainable agriculture. By distinguishing clearly between the different principles of conservation agriculture, the net effects of no‐tillage on improving and sustaining agro‐ecosystems are analyzed based on 49 recent meta‐analyses in this study. The review shows that no‐tillage leads to a significant decline of crop yield (−8.0% to 10.0%, median: −1.9%), whereas residue retention represents the key driver for improving crop production (4.0%–28.0%, median: 8.2%). The efficacy of no‐tillage for water erosion control, especially runoff (−24.0% to −0.7%, median: −10.0%), is often insignificant and otherwise lower compared to residue retention (−87.0% to −14.0%, median: −45.5%). Soil carbon sequestration potential under conservation tillage is quite limited or even close to zero, and if any, it can likely be attributed to the associated residue retention (−0.1% to 12.8%, median: 9.7%) rather than no‐tillage (−2.0% to 10.0%, median: 4.8%). Our analysis illustrates that in conservation agriculture, no‐tillage as the original and central principle of soil management is often less effective than associated supplementary measures, in particular residue retention. Residue retention may therefore play a key role for achieving sustainable land use. An additional benefit of residue retention is the less dramatic change of farming practices compared to no‐tillage. The results of this review illustrate that a new framework for assessing the benefits of conservation practices has to be developed. To till, or not to till, is not the question: residue retention seems more critical.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
张思梦发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
笑点低紊发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
星辰大海的应助被UP采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
3秒前
CipherSage的应助被p1采纳,获得10
3秒前
ding的应助被调皮的樱桃采纳,获得10
3秒前
英姑的应助被健壮的紫夏采纳,获得10
4秒前
yan完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
自觉凌晴完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
搜集达人的应助被李1采纳,获得10
5秒前
selena完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
秋风的应助被困困采纳,获得10
5秒前
无所谓的啦完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
隐形曼青的应助被zzh采纳,获得10
5秒前
大爱发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
asjjahh完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Tonsil01发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
上官若男的应助被疯狂的寒风采纳,获得10
7秒前
娜娜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
俭朴发卡发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
bkagyin的应助被Firsterchao采纳,获得10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被SHN采纳,获得10
8秒前
五档张诊人完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
英俊的铭的应助被迷你的老四采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Joy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李鹏完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
liang发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
萌萌发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
lulu发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
木棉花糖发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
深情安青的应助被yunyi采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
Les Mots du discours 600
OREDA手册2009年第5版 500
A Consideration on Use of Material Grades for Hull Structural Members Based on Fracture Toughness(Second Report) 500
AI Disclosure in Annual Reports: Evolution, Determinants, and Capital Market Participants’ Perceptions 500
5th World Conference on Detergents: Reinventing the Industry : Opportunities and Challenges 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8112940
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9519702
关于积分的说明 21525724
捐赠科研通 7690856
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3412685
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2539213
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2452570