Effect of Disaccharide Inclusion in Vitrification and Warming Solutions on Developmental Competence of Vitrified/Warmed Germinal Vesicle Stage Buffalo Oocytes.

BACKGROUND Cryopreservation of immature oocyte is a potential strategy for preserving the female germline, providing a non-seasonal, easily accessible source for reproduction and science. Exposure of oocytes to high concentrations of cryoprotectants during vitrification is toxic and can negatively impact the fertilization ability and development of vitrified/warmed oocytes. OBJECTIVE 1) to evaluate the effects of exposure of buffalo germinal vesicle (GV) oocytes to different vitrification solutions (VS), either supplemented with or without sucrose, on cumulus expansion and nuclear maturation following IVM; and 2) to compare the effects of sucrose and trehalose in the warming solution on developmental competence of buffalo oocytes vitrified at the GV-stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) obtained at slaughter from mature buffalo ovaries were randomly assigned into five groups: control - directly subjected to IVM); VS1 group - exposed to 20% ethylene glycol (EG) + 20% glycerol (GLY) + 0.5 M sucrose; VS2 group - exposed to 20% EG + 20% GLY; VS3 group - subjected to 20% EG+20% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) + 0.5 M sucrose; and VS4 group - subjected to 20% EG+20% DMSO. Following cryoprotectant dilution, viable oocytes were matured in vitro for 22 h; cumulus expansion and nuclear maturation were then evaluated (Experiment 1). COCs were vitrified by solid surface vitrification (SSV) in a solution composed of 20% EG + 20% DMSO (VS4). Following vitrification, COCs were warmed in a solution composed of either sucrose or trehalose in decreasing concentrations (1 M, 0.5 M and 0.25 M). Morphologically viable oocytes were matured, fertilized and cultured in vitro. Cleavage and blastocyst rates were evaluated at 30 h and day 7 post-insemination (p.i.), respectively (Experiment 2). RESULTS Exposure of GV-buffalo oocytes to different cryoprotectant combinations did not significantly affect cumulus expansion following IVM. However, nuclear maturation rate (oocytes at MII) was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the groups exposed to sucrose-free vitrification solutions (VS2 and VS4) and not significantly different from the control. Compared with the control group, the cleavage and blastocyst rates were significantly (P<0.05) lower in oocytes vitrified and then warmed in a solution containing trehalose; whilst this was not the case when sucrose was present in the solution. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that exposure of buffalo GV-oocytes to sucrose-free vitrification solutions improved nuclear maturation after IVM. Moreover, warming of vitrified buffalo oocytes in sucrose-based solution improved preimplantation development following IVM and IVF compared to trehalose based media.