Conventional surgery versus botulinum toxin injections for partially accommodative esotropia.

To compare the effect of botulinum toxin injection (BTX) to bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) in partially accommodative esotropia (PAET).The medical records of children 1-14 years of age treated for PAET with BMR or BTX between 2010 and 2020 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. PAET was defined as residual esotropia of at least 14Δ after 6 weeks of continuous wear of full cycloplegic refraction (> +2.5 D). Success was defined as esotropia of 0Δ-10Δ after a single surgery or ≥1 BTX injections.Of 224 patients, 121 received BTX and 103 underwent BMR. BMR showed a higher success rate than BTX (70.9% vs 53.7% [P = 0.006]). BMR was more successful in males, in patients >5 years of age, and when spherical equivalent was ≤ +5.00 D (79.2%, 74.3%, and 67.5%, resp. [P < 0.05]). Mean follow-up was shorter in the BMR group than in the BTX group (16.7 ± 14.7 vs 31.4 ± 29.5 months [P = 0.0001]). Mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the BTX group (5.2 ± 4.3 vs 70.5 ± 31.4 min [P = 0.0001]). Postoperative inferior oblique overaction was more common in the BTX group (7.4%; P = 0.02 [Fisher exact test]), and persistent ptosis was only seen in the BTX group (0.8%); consecutive exotropia was only seen in the BMR group (2%).In our study cohort, BMR had a higher success rate than BTX. Conventional surgery allowed for shorter follow-up and fewer complications than BTX in the treatment of PAET.