亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Kwame Nkrumah, African Studies, and the Politics of Knowledge Production in the Black Star of Africa

作者
Jean Allman
出处
期刊:International Journal of African Historical Studies [Boston University]
卷期号:46 (2): 181-203 被引量:33
摘要

IntroductionOn February 24, 1966, Kwame Nkrumah, whose Convention People's Party led Ghana to independence in 1957, was deposed in a military coup. Over the next decade, scholars debated the coup's significance,1 but their focus was almost exclusively on politics: on parties, governance, and the political economy of development. Although four and a half decades have passed since Nkrumah's ouster, historians, for their part, have not yet taken up the 1966 rupture in any detailed or sustained way.2 They have neither interrogated the varied conclusions first drawn by political scientists in the immediate aftermath of the coup, nor prized open new perspectives on the events of 1966. This article is aimed at turning an historical lens on one small, but not insignificant, aspect of Nkrumah's panAfricanist agenda in the 1960s and assessing the impact of the 1966 coup on that vision and its realization. My focus is on postcolonial knowledge production about Africa and two of Nkrumah's specific efforts to transform both scholarly and public understandings of African history and culture locally and globally: the Institute of African Studies and the Encyclopaedia Africana.Numerous scholars have, of course, detailed the long, conflicted, and fractured history of African Studies or knowledge production about Africa.3 Of special note is Paul Tiyambe Zeleza's recent two-volume edited collection on The Study of Africa-a landmark contribution, which details the disciplinary and interdisciplinary groundings of African knowledge production transnational^ and globally4-and William Martin and Michael West's edited collection, Out of One, Many Africas, which explores the multiple paradigms that have sought to bring meaning to the idea of Africa: European colonial, U.S. area studies, pan-Africanist, and African/continental.5 The particularly vexed history of African Studies in North America-anchored to the obdurate racial politics of the United States, tailored to the requirements of the Cold War, and tied to the emergence of the United States as a world power-has generated especially lengthy discussion, including as the subject of more than one presidential address at the annual meeting of the U.S. African Studies Association!6 But across the board what is perhaps most striking about this troubled intellectual history, as Zeleza points out, is the marginalization of Africans and the African academy in knowledge production about Africa:the terms of global intellectual exchange, like the terms of trade ... are decidedly unequal: African studies in the North is a peripheral part of the academy, whereas the Euro-American epistemological order remains central in the African academy. Since the colonial encounter, the construction of scholarly knowledge about Africa has been internationalized both in the sense of it being an activity involving scholars in various parts of the world and the inordinate influence of externally generated models on African scholarship.7But was this outcome already and always inevitable? Perhaps. It is also important to recognize, as Martin and West have recently argued with regard to African Studies in the United States, that Resistance by African scholars and institutions to domination ... deepened over time, a story that for the most part remains to be written.8 This article is aimed at taking one step toward reconstructing that story. Its focus is on a moment in Nkrumah's Ghana, short-lived though it may have been, when no course seemed charted; when it was at least possible to imagine forms of knowledge production about Africa that challenged colonial categories and the conventions of academic disciplines; that was Africa-centered, Africa-based, and globally engaged; that sought to transcend the politics of the Cold War and defy the hegemonic impulse of U.S. racial politics.The Institute of African Studies: Facing ForwardAt the center of this story is the University of Ghana's Institute of African Studies, which was officially opened as a semi-autonomous unit within the university on 25 October 1963. …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
852应助Ax采纳,获得10
刚刚
crystal完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
NexusExplorer应助陆玖笙采纳,获得10
18秒前
动听的诗翠完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
上官若男应助彳亍采纳,获得10
37秒前
完美世界应助xiaonangua采纳,获得10
41秒前
42秒前
举个栗子8完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
57秒前
59秒前
等待凡英完成签到,获得积分10
59秒前
王艺霖发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
彳亍发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
嘟嘟杜完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.4应助王艺霖采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
罗先生完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
陆玖笙发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
王艺霖完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
1分钟前
mmyhn发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
深情安青应助陆玖笙采纳,获得20
1分钟前
彳亍发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
罗先生发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Reseanu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
呆萌的若剑完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
传奇3应助罗先生采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
聪明的梦槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
糊涂的枫发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
一个小胖子完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
天天快乐应助彳亍采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
赘婿应助jfaioe采纳,获得10
2分钟前
xiaonangua发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
彳亍发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Health Psychology 1000
全员动态考核,锚定高质量发展:读懂同济大学教师人事改革新政的深层价值 900
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7597512
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9174163
关于积分的说明 19640297
捐赠科研通 7174398
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3268235
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2432792
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2261483