Stereotactic body radiotherapy alone versus stereotactic body radiotherapy after incomplete transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract Introduction We investigated the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone versus SBRT after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for a single recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 5 cm. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent SBRT for a single recurrent HCC ≤5 cm, without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis. Patients were divided into the SBRT‐alone group and the TACE‐SBRT group. The primary outcome was the local control (LC) rate, and secondary outcomes were survivals and treatment‐related toxicities. We additionally conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results A total of 477 patients were available for analysis. Among them, 54 patients received SBRT without prior treatment to the target lesion (SBRT‐alone group), whereas 423 patients received SBRT for viable HCC after TACE (TACE‐SBRT group). The 3‐year LC rates did not differ between the two groups (SBRT‐alone group, 88.6% vs. TACE‐SBRT group, 89.6%, P = 0.918). The 3‐year rates of overall survival, out‐of‐field intrahepatic recurrence‐free survival and recurrence‐free survival were also not significantly different ( P = 0.479, 0.290 and 0.273, respectively). Even after PSM, LC and survival rates at 3 years were not significantly different. Conclusion SBRT alone demonstrated comparable local control and survival outcomes to SBRT following incomplete TACE. SBRT alone may be considered an alternative treatment option for a single recurrent HCC smaller than 5 cm when curative treatments or TACE are not feasible.