Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Perioperative Blood Loss and Wound Hematoma Development in Lumbar Spine Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Study

氨甲环酸 医学 麻醉 外科 血肿 减压 失血 围手术期 随机对照试验 输血 腰椎
作者
Přemysl Stejskal,Štefan Trnka,Lumír Hrabálek,T. WANEK,Jakub Jablonský,Vlastimil Novák
出处
期刊:Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae Et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca [Medical publishing house Galen]
卷期号:90 (3): 176-180 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.55095/achot2023/022
摘要

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Tranexamic acid as a haemostatic agent is commonly used in multiple medical branches. Over the last decade, there has been a steep rise in the number of studies evaluating its effect, i.e. blood loss reduction in specific surgical procedures. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of tranexamic acid on reducing intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss into the drain, total blood loss, transfusion requirements, and development of symptomatic wound hematoma in conventional single-level lumbar decompression and stabilization. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included patients who had undergone a traditional open lumbar spine surgery in the form of single-level decompression and stabilisation. The patients were randomized into two groups. The study group received a 15 mg/kg dose of tranexamic acid intravenously during the induction of anaesthesia and then again 6 hours later. No tranexamic acid was administered to the control group. In all patients, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss into the drain, and therefore also total blood loss, transfusion requirements and potential development of a symptomatic postoperative wound hematoma requiring surgical evacuation were recorded. The data of the two groups were compared. RESULTS The cohort includes 162 patients, 81 in the study group and the same number in the control group. In the intraoperative blood loss assessment, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed; 430 (190-910) mL vs. 435 (200-900) mL. In case of post-operative drain blood loss, a statistically significantly lower volume was reported after the tranexamic acid administration; 405 (180-750) mL vs. 490 (210-820) mL. When evaluating the total blood loss, a statistically significant difference was also confirmed, namely in favour of the tranexamic acid; 860 (470-1410) mL vs. 910 (500- 1420) mL. The reduction of total blood loss did not result in a difference in the number of administered transfusions; transfusions were given to 4 patients in each group. A postoperative wound hematoma requiring surgical evacuation developed in 1 patient in the group with the tranexamic acid and in 4 patients in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant with respect to the insufficient group size. No patient in our study experienced complications associated with tranexamic acid application. DISCUSSION The beneficial effect of tranexamic acid on reducing blood loss in lumbar spine surgeries has already been confirmed by numerous meta-analyses. The question remains in what types of procedures, at what dose and route of administration its effect is significant. To date, most of the studies have explored its effect in multi-level decompressions and stabilizations. Raksakietisak et al., for instance, report significant reduction in total blood loss from 900 (160, 4150) mL to 600 (200, 4750) mL following an intravenous injection of 2 bolus doses of 15 mg/kg tranexamic acid. In less extensive spinal surgeries, the effect of tranexamic acid may not be that distinct. In our study of single-level decompressions and stabilizations, no reduction in the actual intraoperative bleeding was confirmed at the given dosage. Its effect was seen only in the postoperative period in a significant reduction of blood loss into the drain, thus also in the total blood loss, although the difference between 910 (500, 1420) mL and 860 (470, 1410) mL was not that significant. CONCLUSIONS By intravenous application of tranexamic acid in 2 bolus doses in single-level decompression and stabilization of the lumbar spine a statistically significant reduction in postoperative blood loss into the drain and also total blood loss was confirmed. The reduction in the actual intraoperative blood loss was not statistically significant. No difference was observed in the number of administered transfusions. Following the tranexamic acid administration, a lower number of postoperative symptomatic wound hematomas was recorded, but the difference was not statistically significant. Key words: tranexamic acid, spinal surgeries, blood loss, postoperative hematoma.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
kong应助网安小趴菜采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
邺水朱华完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
yuzhi完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
huang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
GYJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
金扇扇完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
乾乾完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
微笑的井完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
舒心冰彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
zimo发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
共享精神应助998877剑指采纳,获得10
7秒前
无味完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
8秒前
畅快的小虾米完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
llllhh完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Owen应助cc哈库纳玛塔塔采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
噜噜发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
jidou1011完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
星辰大海应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
12秒前
完美的沉鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
Lucas应助发仔采纳,获得10
12秒前
good233完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
BeiBei发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
峰儿背完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
许晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
懵懂的毛豆完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
可可可爱完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
ZZzz完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
噜噜完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
呆萌魏发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
猪猪hero发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
chrysan完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
默默的无敌完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
ICDD求助cif文件 500
First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies, 2nd Edition 500
Assessment of adverse effects of Alzheimer's disease medications: Analysis of notifications to Regional Pharmacovigilance Centers in Northwest France 400
The Secrets of Successful Product Launches 300
The Rise & Fall of Classical Legal Thought 260
Geography : the study of location, culture, and environment 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4345103
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3851821
关于积分的说明 12022213
捐赠科研通 3493374
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1916927
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 959869
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 859989