医学
扁桃体切除术
科克伦图书馆
随机对照试验
荟萃分析
梅德林
止痛药
出版偏见
系统回顾
物理疗法
麻醉
外科
内科学
政治学
法学
作者
Seyed Javad Hosseini,Seyed Reza Hosseini,Amirreza Jamshidbeigi,Gholam Reza Mahmoodi‐Shan,Fatemeh Hajiabadi,Masoud Abdollahi,Mahbobeh Firooz
摘要
ABSTRACT Background This study investigates the effect of locally applied honey on pain intensity, analgesia consumption, pain relief and nighttime awakenings in children following tonsillectomy, addressing conflicting evidence and the lack of differentiation between adult and paediatric populations in previous reviews. Methods A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , MEDLINE, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pain outcomes in children receiving honey in addition to standard treatments versus those receiving standard treatments alone were included. Pain intensity was measured with the VAS tool. Meta‐analysis was performed using STATA version 14 software. Also, risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated. Results Out of 537 articles, seven studies ( n = 710) with RCT design met the inclusion criteria. The average duration for measuring pain intensity was 7.37 days. Pooled effect size showed a statistically significant reduction in pain intensity in the honey intervention group compared to the control group (WMD: −0.90, 95% CI [−1.32, −0.48], p < 0.001, I 2 : 92.5%; certainty of evidence: low). Also, the results demonstrated that honey significantly decreased the average time required for pain relief and analgesic consumption in the intervention group compared to the control group. One study was deemed low risk of bias, four studies were of intermediate quality and two studies were evaluated as high. Conclusion While honey shows promise in reducing post‐tonsillectomy pain, cautious use is advised due to the limited quality of evidence. More robust RCTs are needed to address biases and reinforce confidence in the findings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI