不确定
医学
甲状腺结节
荟萃分析
异型性
甲状腺癌
癌症
病理
核异型性
甲状腺
放射科
肿瘤科
内科学
恶性肿瘤
免疫组织化学
纯数学
数学
作者
Pablo Valderrábano,Laila Khazai,Zachary Thompson,Susan C. Sharpe,Valentina D. Tarasova,Kristen J. Otto,Julie E. Hallanger Johnson,Jeffery Trad Wadsworth,Bruce M. Wenig,Christine H. Chung,Barbara Ann Centeno,Bryan McIver
出处
期刊:Thyroid
[Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.]
日期:2017-11-21
卷期号:28 (2): 210-219
被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1089/thy.2017.0419
摘要
BACKGROUND: Indeterminate categories of thyroid cytopathology (categories B-III and B-IV of the Bethesda system) are integrated by a heterogeneous spectrum of cytological scenarios that are generally clustered for analysis and management recommendations. It has been suggested that aspirates exhibiting nuclear atypia have a higher risk of malignancy. This study aimed to assess whether cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with nuclear atypia have a significantly higher cancer risk than those without nuclear atypia. METHODS: On June 30, 2016, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for articles in English or Spanish using a search strategy developed by an endocrinologist and a librarian. Case reports were excluded, and no date limits were used. The references of all included studies were also screened for relevant missing studies. Studies were included if the prevalences of malignancy of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with histological confirmation with and without nuclear atypia were reported. Studies were excluded if they had: (i) nodules suspicious for malignancy; (ii) nodules with non-indeterminate (B-III or B-IV) cytology on repeated biopsy, if performed; (iii) nodules not consecutively evaluated; or (iv) cohorts overlapping with another larger series. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility and risk of bias of the studies. PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines were followed. Summary data were extracted from published reports by one investigator and independently reviewed by another. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis and mixed-effect model meta-regression. The odds ratio for malignancy of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with nuclear atypia over cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules without nuclear atypia was calculated. RESULTS: < 0.01%, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Nuclear atypia is a significant indicator of malignancy in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules and needs to be standardized and implemented into clinical practice.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI