Use of Clinical and Echocardiographic Evaluation to Assess the Risk of Heart Failure

Clinical and echocardiographic features predict incident heart failure (HF), but the optimal strategy for combining them is unclear. This study sought to define an effective means of using echocardiography in HF risk evaluation. The same clinical and echocardiographic evaluation was obtained in 2 groups with HF risk factors: a training group (n = 926, followed to 7 years) and a validation group (n = 355, followed to 10 years). Clinical risk was categorized as low, intermediate, and high using 4-year ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) HF risk score cutpoints of 9% and 33%. A risk stratification algorithm based on clinical risk and echocardiographic markers of stage B HF (SBHF) (abnormal global longitudinal strain [GLS], diastolic dysfunction, or left ventricular hypertrophy) was developed using a classification and regression tree analysis and was validated. HF developed in 12% of the training group, including 9%, 18%, and 73% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. HF occurred in 8.6% of stage A HF and 19.4% of SBHF (P < 0.001), but stage A HF with clinical risk of ≥9% had similar outcome to SBHF. Abnormal GLS (HR: 2.92 [95% CI: 1.95-4.37]; P < 0.001) was the strongest independent predictor of HF. Normal GLS and diastolic function reclassified 61% of the intermediate-risk group into the low-risk group (HF incidence: 12%). In the validation group, 11% developed HF over 4.5 years; 4%, 17%, and 39% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Similar results were obtained after exclusion of patients with known coronary artery disease. The echocardiographic parameters also provided significant incremental value to the ARIC score in predicting new HF admission (C-statistic: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.71-0.84] vs 0.83 [95% CI: 0.77-0.88]; P = 0.027). Clinical risk assessment is adequate to classify low and high HF risk. Echocardiographic evaluation reclassifies 61% of intermediate-risk patients.