医学
可视模拟标度
根管
统计显著性
灌溉
低强度激光治疗
牙科
臼齿
随机对照试验
麻醉
外科
激光器
内科学
激光治疗
物理
光学
生物
生态学
作者
Neelam Mittal,Harakh Chand Baranwal,Sakshi Gupta,Thivya Shankari,Supriya Gupta,Shubham Kharat
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2023-05-19
卷期号:26 (2): 143-149
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_450_22
摘要
To assess the effects of different irrigation activation systems on postoperative pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), using new laser irrigation activation system shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques, compared with the conventional irrigation (CI) method.Sixty patients suffering from symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary or mandibular molars were enrolled and randomly assigned to four different irrigation activation groups (n = 15) after chemomechanical root canal preparation. Preoperative and postoperative pain scores were recorded using VAS. The data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05.We observed that mean pain scores decreased with time in all patients in all groups. The decrease in pain score was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) among both the genders in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 4 (SWEEPS). Postoperatively, pain scores decreased significantly using Group 4 (SWEEPS), followed by Group 3 (PIPS), Group 2 (ultrasonic activation), and Group 1 (conventional needle irrigation). No significant relation was observed statistically between pain scores and age groups among all groups, except for preoperative score in Group 3 and age groups.Postoperative scores were lower in laser-activated irrigation systems as compared to the other activation systems. The highest pain scores were observed in case of CI method, at pre- and post-operative periods.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI