医学
持续气道正压
随机对照试验
麻醉
内科学
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
Vanessa Bironneau,Pierre Ingrand,S. Pontier,C. Iamandi,L. Portel,Francis Martin,A. Mallart,Lionel Lerousseau,Didier Alfandary,Virginie Levrat,Florence Portier,Renaud Tamisier,F. Goutorbe,Claudio Rabec,François Codron,G Aurégan,Magalie Mercy,Valérie Attali,Frank Soyez,Claire Launois
出处
期刊:Respirology
[Wiley]
日期:2023-08-16
卷期号:28 (11): 1069-1077
被引量:5
摘要
Abstract Background and Objective Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can be used in fixed CPAP or auto‐adjusted (APAP) mode. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate the 3 month‐efficacy of CPAP used either in fixed CPAP or APAP mode. Methods Eight hundred one patients with severe OSA were included in twenty‐two French centres. After 7 days during which all patients were treated with APAP to determine the effective pressure level and its variability, 353 and 351 patients were respectively randomized in the fixed CPAP group and APAP group. After 3 months of treatment, 308 patients in each group were analysed. Results There was no difference between the two groups in terms of efficacy whatever the level of efficient pressure and pressure variability ( p = 0.41). Exactly, 219 of 308 patients (71.1%) in the fixed CPAP group and 212 of 308 (68.8%) in the APAP group ( p = 0.49) demonstrated residual apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI) <10/h and Epworth Score <11. Tolerance and adherence were also identical with a similar effect on quality of life and blood pressure evaluation. Conclusion The two CPAP modes, fixed CPAP and APAP, were equally effective and tolerated in severe OSA patients.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI