亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Immunogenicity and safety of a pentavalent meningococcal ABCWY vaccine in adolescents and young adults: an observer-blind, active-controlled, randomised trial

免疫原性 医学 脑膜炎球菌疫苗 类毒素 接种疫苗 破伤风 结合疫苗 流行性脑脊髓膜炎 免疫学 儿科 脑膜炎奈瑟菌 抗体 免疫 生物 遗传学 细菌
作者
James T. Peterson,Daniel Dražan,Hanna Czajka,Jason D. Maguire,Jean-Louis Prégaldien,IIkka Seppa,Roger Maansson,Robert O’Neill,Paul Balmer,Luis Jódar,Kathrin U. Jansen,Annaliesa S. Anderson,John L. Perez,Johannes Beeslaar
出处
期刊:Lancet Infectious Diseases [Elsevier]
卷期号:23 (12): 1370-1382 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00191-3
摘要

Meningococcal serogroups A, B, C, W, and Y cause nearly all meningococcal disease, and comprehensive protection requires vaccination against all five serogroups. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a pentavalent MenABCWY vaccine comprising two licensed vaccines-meningococcal serogroup B-factor H binding protein vaccine (MenB-FHbp) and a quadrivalent meningococcal serogroup ACWY tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-TT)-compared with two doses of MenB-FHbp and a single dose of quadrivalent meningococcal serogroup ACWY CRM197-conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) as the active control. We previously reported the primary safety and immunogenicity data relating to the two-dose MenB-FHbp schedule. Here we report secondary outcomes and ad-hoc analyses relating to MenABCWY immunogenicity and safety.We did an observer-blind, active-controlled trial at 68 sites in the USA, Czech Republic, Finland, and Poland. Healthy individuals (aged 10-25 years) who had or had not previously received a MenACWY vaccine were randomly assigned (1:2) using an interactive voice or web-based response system, stratified by previous receipt of a MenACWY vaccine, to receive 0·5 mL of MenABCWY (months 0 and 6) and placebo (month 0) or MenB-FHbp (months 0 and 6) and MenACWY-CRM (month 0) via intramuscular injection into the upper deltoid. All individuals were masked to group allocation, except staff involved in vaccine dispensation, preparation, and administration; and protocol adherence. Endpoints for serogroups A, C, W, and Y included the proportion of participants who achieved at least a four-fold increase in serum bactericidal antibody using human complement (hSBA) titres between baseline and 1 month after each vaccination. For serogroup B, secondary endpoints included the proportion of participants who achieved at least a four-fold increase in hSBA titres from baseline for each of four primary test strains and the proportion of participants who achieved titres of at least the lower limit of quantitation against all four test strains combined at 1 month after the second dose. Endpoints for serogroups A, C, W, and Y were assessed in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all randomly assigned participants who received at least one vaccine dose and had at least one valid and determinate MenB or serogroup A, C, W, or Y assay result before vaccination up to 1 month after the second dose, assessed in ACWY-experienced and ACWY-naive participants separately. Secondary endpoints for serogroup B were analysed in the evaluable immunogenicity population, which included all participants in the mITT population who were randomly assigned to the group of interest, received all investigational products as randomly assigned, had blood drawn for assay testing within the required time frames, had at least one valid and determinate MenB assay result after the second vaccination, and had no important protocol deviations; outcomes were assessed in both ACWY-experienced and ACWY-naive populations combined. Non-inferiority of MenABCWY to MenACWY-CRM and MenB-FHbp was determined using a -10% non-inferiority margin for these endpoints. Reactogenicity and adverse events were assessed among all participants who received at least one vaccine dose and who had available safety data. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03135834, and is complete.Between April 24 and November 10, 2017, 1610 participants (809 MenACWY-naive; 801 MenACWY-experienced) were randomly assigned: 544 to receive MenABCWY and placebo (n=272 MenACWY-naive; n=272 MenACWY-experienced) and 1066 to receive MenB-FHbp and MenACWY-CRM (n=537 MenACWY-naive; n=529 MenACWY-experienced). Among MenACWY-naive or MenACWY-experienced MenABCWY recipients, 75·5% (95% CI 69·8-80·6; 194 of 257; serogroup C) to 96·9% (94·1-98·7; 254 of 262; serogroup A) and 93·0% (88·4-96·2; 174 of 187; serogroup Y) to 97·4% (94·4-99·0; 224 of 230; serogroup W) achieved at least four-fold increases in hSBA titres against serogroups ACWY after dose 1 or 2, respectively, in ad-hoc analyses. Additionally, 75·8% (71·5-79·8; 320 of 422) to 94·7% (92·1-96·7; 396 of 418) of MenABCWY and 67·4% (64·1-70·6; 563 of 835) to 95·0% (93·3-96·4; 782 of 823) of MenB-FHbp recipients achieved at least four-fold increases in hSBA titres against MenB strains after dose 2 in secondary analyses; 79·9% (334 of 418; 75·7-83·6) and 74·3% (71·2-77·3; 605 of 814), respectively, achieved composite responses. MenABCWY was non-inferior to MenACWY-CRM (single dose) and to MenB-FHbp in ad-hoc analyses based on the proportion of participants with at least a four-fold increase in hSBA titres from baseline and (for MenB-FHbp only) composite responses. Reactogenicity events after vaccination were similarly frequent across groups, were mostly mild or moderate, and were unaffected by MenACWY experience. No adverse events causing withdrawals were related to the investigational product. Serious adverse events were reported in four (1·5%; 0·4-3·7) MenACWY-naive individuals in the MenABCWY group versus six (2·2%; 0·8-4·8) among MenACWY-experienced individuals in the MenABCWY group and 14 (1·3%; 0·7-2·2) in the active control group (MenACWY-experienced and MenACWY-naive individuals combined); none of these were considered related to the investigational product.MenABCWY immune responses were robust and non-inferior to MenACWY-CRM and MenB-FHbp administered separately, and MenABCWY was well tolerated. The favourable benefit-risk profile supports further MenABCWY evaluation as a simplified schedule compared with current adolescent meningococcal vaccination programmes.Pfizer.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Fairy完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
小二郎应助高大的羿采纳,获得10
45秒前
54秒前
WXKennyS发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
王饱饱完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
ljl86400完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
pursu发布了新的文献求助30
2分钟前
不安的未来完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
pursu完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
blenx完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
yf完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
4分钟前
慕青发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
SCI完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
4分钟前
WXKennyS发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
默默完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
5分钟前
陈彦希发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
Nikki发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
6分钟前
Nikki完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
sissie发布了新的文献求助10
6分钟前
李健应助sissie采纳,获得10
6分钟前
李小强完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
7分钟前
MaKJ发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
8分钟前
8分钟前
Mingyue123发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
yb完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
weibo完成签到,获得积分10
8分钟前
PALMS发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
PALMS完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Bandwidth Choice for Bias Estimators in Dynamic Nonlinear Panel Models 2000
HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE CMOS IMAGE SENSORS FOR LOW LIGHT APPLICATIONS 1500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 1000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 530
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5357085
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4488652
关于积分的说明 13972405
捐赠科研通 4389765
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2411715
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1404271
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1378414