Prediction Models for Dysphagia in Intensive Care Unit after Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

荟萃分析 吞咽困难 机械通风 重症监护室 医学 系统回顾 重症监护医学 梅德林 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Juan Chen,Guangyu Lu,Zhiyao Wang,Jingyue Zhang,Jiali Ding,Qingping Zeng,Liying Chai,Li Zhao,Hailong Yu,Yuping Li
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.30931
摘要

Objective Dysphagia is a common condition that can independently lead to death in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), particularly those who require mechanical ventilation. Despite extensive research on the predictors of dysphagia development, consistency across these studies is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors and summarize existing prediction models for dysphagia in ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods We searched five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Studies that developed a post‐extubation dysphagia risk prediction model in ICU were included. A meta‐analysis of individual predictor variables was performed with mixed‐effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). Results After screening 1,923 references, we ultimately included nine studies in our analysis. The most commonly identified risk predictors included in the final risk prediction model were the length of indwelling endotracheal tube ≥72 h, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥15, age ≥65 years, and duration of gastric tube ≥72 h. However, PROBAST analysis revealed a high risk of bias in the performance of these prediction models, mainly because of the lack of external validation, inadequate pre‐screening of variables, and improper treatment of continuous and categorical predictors. Conclusions These models are particularly susceptible to bias because of numerous limitations in their development and inadequate external validation. Future research should focus on externally validating the existing model in ICU patients with varying characteristics. Moreover, assessing the acceptance and effectiveness of the model in clinical practice is needed. Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope , 2023
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
偶然完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
2秒前
xjian完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
核桃应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
Joy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
汉堡包应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
某某某应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
pluto应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
小花排草应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
3秒前
pluto应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3秒前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
3秒前
KT完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
Lucy11grandma关注了科研通微信公众号
4秒前
乔垣结衣应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
科研通AI5应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
田様应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
完美世界应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
颜千琴发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
ding应助j222采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
田様应助王也夫采纳,获得10
9秒前
科研通AI5应助ssf采纳,获得10
11秒前
思源应助颜千琴采纳,获得10
11秒前
健壮雨完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
甜美白昼完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
求polyinfo中的所有数据,主要要共聚物的,有偿。 1500
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 800
Византийско-аланские отно- шения (VI–XII вв.) 500
Mechanics of Composite Strengthening 500
水稻光合CO2浓缩机制的创建及其作用研究 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4175859
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3711116
关于积分的说明 11703907
捐赠科研通 3394211
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1862286
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 921099
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 833007