Prediction Models for Dysphagia in Intensive Care Unit after Mechanical Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

荟萃分析 吞咽困难 机械通风 重症监护室 医学 系统回顾 重症监护医学 梅德林 外科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Juan Chen,Guangyu Lu,Zhiyao Wang,Jingyue Zhang,Jiali Ding,Qingping Zeng,Liying Chai,Li Zhao,Hailong Yu,Yuping Li
出处
期刊:Laryngoscope [Wiley]
卷期号:134 (2): 517-525 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1002/lary.30931
摘要

Objective Dysphagia is a common condition that can independently lead to death in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), particularly those who require mechanical ventilation. Despite extensive research on the predictors of dysphagia development, consistency across these studies is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors and summarize existing prediction models for dysphagia in ICU patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Methods We searched five databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Studies that developed a post‐extubation dysphagia risk prediction model in ICU were included. A meta‐analysis of individual predictor variables was performed with mixed‐effects models. The risk of bias was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). Results After screening 1,923 references, we ultimately included nine studies in our analysis. The most commonly identified risk predictors included in the final risk prediction model were the length of indwelling endotracheal tube ≥72 h, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥15, age ≥65 years, and duration of gastric tube ≥72 h. However, PROBAST analysis revealed a high risk of bias in the performance of these prediction models, mainly because of the lack of external validation, inadequate pre‐screening of variables, and improper treatment of continuous and categorical predictors. Conclusions These models are particularly susceptible to bias because of numerous limitations in their development and inadequate external validation. Future research should focus on externally validating the existing model in ICU patients with varying characteristics. Moreover, assessing the acceptance and effectiveness of the model in clinical practice is needed. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 134:517–525, 2024
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
Ava应助浪子采纳,获得10
1秒前
大模型应助相对论效应采纳,获得10
1秒前
尘林发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
方寸完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
adasd应助yang采纳,获得10
2秒前
111111完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
生动项链发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
锅巴洋芋发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
胡涂图完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Anquan发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
温乘云发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
JamesPei应助简单不言采纳,获得10
5秒前
cpl完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
卷卷完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
找不到发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Fanbio完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
Eden完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
cielk发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
叶笑笑发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
Kevin Li发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
tttll3完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
FashionBoy应助毓雅采纳,获得10
8秒前
冥思苦想决定丢下一切睡觉完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
DW应助北大荒采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
冻冻妖完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
windows发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
chenjingru完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
11秒前
HU给HU的求助进行了留言
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1314
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7735071
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9285241
关于积分的说明 20170075
捐赠科研通 7313007
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3304825
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457410
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2314197