接头(建筑物)
均方误差
运动分析
相关系数
可靠性(半导体)
运动捕捉
计算机科学
膝关节
运动范围
数学
运动(物理)
人工智能
模拟
统计
物理疗法
医学
工程类
外科
结构工程
物理
功率(物理)
量子力学
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.medntd.2022.100188
摘要
OpenPose (OP) and DeepLabCut (DLC) are applications that use deep learning to estimate posture, but there are few reports on the reliability, validity, and accuracy of their 2D lower limb joint motion analysis. This study compared OP and DLC estimates of lower extremity joint angles in standing movements with those of conventional software. A total of nine healthy men participated. The trial task was to stand up from a chair. The motion was recorded by a digital camera, and the joint angles of the hip and knee joints were calculated from the video using OP, DLC, and Kinovea. To confirm reliability and validity, ICC was calculated using the Kinovea value as the validity criterion and the correlation coefficient between OP and DLC. In addition, the agreement between those data was evaluated by the Bland-Altman plot. To evaluate the accuracy of the data, root means square error (RMSE) was calculated and compared for each joint. Although the correlation coefficients and ICC (2, 1) were in almost perfect agreement, fixed and proportional errors were found for most joints. The RMSE was smaller for OP than for DLC. Compared to Kinovea, OP and DLC can estimate the joint angles of the hip and knee joints during the stand-up movement with an estimation error of fewer than 10°, but since they are affected by the resolution of the analysis video and other factors, they need to be validated in a variety of environments and with a variety of movements.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI