医学
心肌梗塞
内科学
心力衰竭
危险系数
索他洛尔
比例危险模型
药方
心脏病学
β受体阻滞剂
糖尿病
卡维地洛
阿替洛尔
置信区间
药理学
心房颤动
血压
内分泌学
作者
Søren Skøtt Andersen,Morten Lock Hansen,Gunnar Gislason,Fredrik Folke,Tina Ken Schramm,Emil Loldrup Fosbøl,Rikke Sørensen,Søren Rasmussen,Steen Z. Abildstrøm,Mette Madsen,Lars Køber,Christian Torp‐Pedersen
出处
期刊:Cardiology
[Karger Publishers]
日期:2008-07-09
卷期号:112 (2): 144-150
被引量:16
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To study differences in the clinical efficacy of various brands of beta-blocker in secondary prevention after a myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: All patients hospitalized with a first MI between 1995 and 2002 who were still alive 30 days after discharge and had had at least one prescription for a beta-blocker filled were identified by individual-level linkage of nationwide registries of hospitalizations and drugs dispensed from pharmacies. A total of 32,259 MI patients were included in the study. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the risks of death and recurrent MI related to treatment with different beta-blockers. RESULTS: The risks for death and recurrent MI were similar in patients using different beta-blockers, except that mortality from all causes among patients with a prescription for sotalol was higher. Subgroup analyses of high-risk patients with diabetes or congestive heart failure and of patients using comparable dosages of beta-blockers did not show effects on the risk of death or recurrent MI. CONCLUSION: Except for sotalol, the different types of beta-blocker had similar clinical efficacy in reducing mortality and the recurrence of MI. The equivalent efficacy remained when high-risk patients were analyzed separately.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI