已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Efficacy of sedation with dexmedetomidine plus propofol during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

异丙酚 医学 右美托咪定 麻醉 镇静 食管切除术 外科 临床终点 食管癌 随机对照试验 内科学 癌症
作者
Keiichi Ashikari,Takashi Nonaka,Takuma Higurashi,Tomohiro Takatsu,Tsutomu Yoshihara,Noboru Misawa,Jun Arimoto,Kenji Kanoshima,Tetsuya Matsuura,Akiko Fuyuki,Hidenori Ohkubo,Hideyuki Chiba,Atsushi Nakajima
出处
期刊:Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Wiley]
卷期号:36 (7): 1920-1926 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.1111/jgh.15417
摘要

Abstract Background and Aim During endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer, patient body movement can sometimes occur, which may cause discontinuation of the procedure. Propofol and dexmedetomidine have recently been found to be useful sedatives for endoscopic submucosal dissection. This study investigated whether sedation using propofol plus dexmedetomidine can suppress the patient's body movements during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection and compared this combination with sedation using propofol alone. Methods This was a prospective double‐blind randomized controlled trial. Patients with superficial esophageal cancers who underwent esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection at Yokohama City University Hospital were prospectively enrolled and were randomly assigned to the propofol and the propofol plus dexmedetomidine groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of restlessness. The secondary endpoints were the satisfaction score, maintenance dose of propofol, and number of rescue propofol injections. Results Sixty‐six patients (propofol group: n = 33; combination group: n = 33) were included. The combination group had a significantly lower incidence of restlessness than the propofol group (3.0% vs 27.3%, P = 0.02). In the combination group, the satisfaction scores of the endoscopists were significantly higher, the maintenance dose of propofol was significantly lower, and the number of rescue propofol injections was lower than those in the propofol group (3.0% vs 18.2%, P < 0.001). Although the incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the combination group (30.3% vs 3.0%, P < 0.01), no serious adverse effects occurred. Conclusion The propofol plus dexmedetomidine combination provided excellent sedation that effectively suppressed the patient's body movements during esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Fcccccccz发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
烟花的应助被2256282919采纳,获得10
1秒前
飞龙在天完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
852的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
ex02发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
改良這人生灬完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
香蕉觅云的应助被傻子与白痴采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
番茄番茄完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
chengzi完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
欣喜飞飞发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
涂豆泥完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
学不完了完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
8564523完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
whoknowsname完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
Nole的应助被BioRick采纳,获得10
21秒前
橘子海完成签到 ,获得积分0
21秒前
GAP完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
2256282919发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
蛋卷完成签到 ,获得积分0
26秒前
28秒前
28秒前
火星种芹菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
maclogos完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
32秒前
32秒前
33秒前
小兰发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
35秒前
36秒前
Fcccccccz完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
38秒前
qqq完成签到 ,获得积分0
38秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
The Student's Guide to Social Neuroscience 800
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7812563
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9343611
关于积分的说明 20518881
捐赠科研通 7405293
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3330107
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2476734
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2349694