Dialectical Behavior Therapy for High Suicide Risk in Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder

边缘型人格障碍 辩证行为治疗 心理学 随机对照试验 临床心理学 自杀未遂 动机式访谈 指导 毒物控制 精神科 自杀预防 医学 心理治疗师 干预(咨询) 内科学 环境卫生
作者
Marsha M. Linehan,Kathryn E. Korslund,Melanie S. Harned,Robert Gallop,Anita Lungu,Andrada D. Neacsiu,Joshua McDavid,Katherine Anne Comtois,Angela M. Murray-Gregory
出处
期刊:JAMA Psychiatry [American Medical Association]
卷期号:72 (5): 475-475 被引量:477
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3039
摘要

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is an empirically supported treatment for suicidal individuals. However, DBT consists of multiple components, including individual therapy, skills training, telephone coaching, and a therapist consultation team, and little is known about which components are needed to achieve positive outcomes.To evaluate the importance of the skills training component of DBT by comparing skills training plus case management (DBT-S), DBT individual therapy plus activities group (DBT-I), and standard DBT which includes skills training and individual therapy.We performed a single-blind randomized clinical trial from April 24, 2004, through January 26, 2010, involving 1 year of treatment and 1 year of follow-up. Participants included 99 women (mean age, 30.3 years; 69 [71%] white) with borderline personality disorder who had at least 2 suicide attempts and/or nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) acts in the last 5 years, an NSSI act or suicide attempt in the 8 weeks before screening, and a suicide attempt in the past year. We used an adaptive randomization procedure to assign participants to each condition. Treatment was delivered from June 3, 2004, through September 29, 2008, in a university-affiliated clinic and community settings by therapists or case managers. Outcomes were evaluated quarterly by blinded assessors. We hypothesized that standard DBT would outperform DBT-S and DBT-I.The study compared standard DBT, DBT-S, and DBT-I. Treatment dose was controlled across conditions, and all treatment providers used the DBT suicide risk assessment and management protocol.Frequency and severity of suicide attempts and NSSI episodes.All treatment conditions resulted in similar improvements in the frequency and severity of suicide attempts, suicide ideation, use of crisis services due to suicidality, and reasons for living. Compared with the DBT-I group, interventions that included skills training resulted in greater improvements in the frequency of NSSI acts (F1,85 = 59.1 [P < .001] for standard DBT and F1,85 = 56.3 [P < .001] for DBT-S) and depression (t399 = 1.8 [P = .03] for standard DBT and t399 = 2.9 [P = .004] for DBT-S) during the treatment year. In addition, anxiety significantly improved during the treatment year in standard DBT (t94 = -3.5 [P < .001]) and DBT-S (t94 = -2.6 [P = .01]), but not in DBT-I. Compared with the DBT-I group, the standard DBT group had lower dropout rates from treatment (8 patients [24%] vs 16 patients [48%] [P = .04]), and patients were less likely to use crisis services in follow-up (ED visits, 1 [3%] vs 3 [13%] [P = .02]; psychiatric hospitalizations, 1 [3%] vs 3 [13%] [P = .03]).A variety of DBT interventions with therapists trained in the DBT suicide risk assessment and management protocol are effective for reducing suicide attempts and NSSI episodes. Interventions that include DBT skills training are more effective than DBT without skills training, and standard DBT may be superior in some areas.clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00183651.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
die完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
LCCCC发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
ewyzero应助豆子采纳,获得10
1秒前
华仔应助豆子采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助豆子采纳,获得10
1秒前
FelixChen应助豆子采纳,获得20
1秒前
Orange应助jasmine采纳,获得10
1秒前
汪小珍完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lucky发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
参商发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
曾经凡之完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
guojinyu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
tommylike完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Demi完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
newnew完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
sunyz应助quhayley采纳,获得50
6秒前
在木星发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
flylmy2008完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
动漫大师发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
7秒前
慕青应助就叫小王吧采纳,获得10
7秒前
未了发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
温暖寻云发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
平常的一完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
君莫笑完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
嘚嘚完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
搜集达人应助酷酷的王采纳,获得10
9秒前
xin完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Cherry完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
甲第完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
狄从灵发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
林生完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
chrisio发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
高分求助中
Chinesen in Europa – Europäer in China: Journalisten, Spione, Studenten 500
Arthur Ewert: A Life for the Comintern 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi // Kurt Werner Radtke 500
Two Years in Peking 1965-1966: Book 1: Living and Teaching in Mao's China // Reginald Hunt 500
Epigenetic Drug Discovery 500
Pathology of Laboratory Rodents and Rabbits (5th Edition) 400
Knowledge management in the fashion industry 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3816440
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3359935
关于积分的说明 10405824
捐赠科研通 3077960
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1690410
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 813778
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 767845