Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021

医学 感染性休克 拯救脓毒症运动 麻醉学 败血症 重症监护医学 分级(工程) 循证医学 梅德林 循证实践 严重败血症 最佳实践 复苏 替代医学 急诊医学 外科 病理 土木工程 管理 政治学 法学 工程类 经济
作者
Laura Evans,Andrew Rhodes,Waleed Alhazzani,Massimo Antonelli,Craig M. Coopersmith,Craig French,Flávia Ribeiro Machado,Lauralyn McIntyre,Marlies Ostermann,Hallie C. Prescott,Christa Schorr,Steven Q. Simpson,W. Joost Wiersinga,Fayez Alshamsi,Derek C. Angus,Yaseen M. Arabi,Luciano César Pontes Azevedo,Richard Beale,Gregory J. Beilman,Emilie P. Belley‐Côté
出处
期刊:Intensive Care Medicine [Springer Science+Business Media]
卷期号:47 (11): 1181-1247 被引量:4930
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
摘要

Background Sepsis poses a global threat to millions of lives. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the recognition and management of sepsis and its complications. Methods We formed a panel of 60 experts from 22 countries and 11 members of the public. The panel prioritized questions that are relevant to the recognition and management of sepsis and septic shock in adults. New questions and sections were addressed, relative to the previous guidelines. These questions were grouped under 6 subgroups (screening and early treatment, infection, hemodynamics, ventilation, additional therapies, and long-term outcomes and goals of care). With input from the panel and methodologists, professional medical librarians performed the search strategy tailored to either specific questions or a group of relevant questions. A dedicated systematic review team performed screening and data abstraction when indicated. For each question, the methodologists, with input from panel members, summarized the evidence assessed and graded the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The panel generated recommendations using the evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice statements. When evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation, the panel was surveyed to generate “in our practice” statements. Results The SSC panel issued 93 statements: 15 best practice statements, 15 strong recommendations, and 54 weak recommendations and no recommendation was provided for 9 questions. The recommendations address several important clinical areas related to screening tools, acute resuscitation strategies, management of fluids and vasoactive agents, antimicrobials and diagnostic tests and the use of additional therapies, ventilation management, goals of care, and post sepsis care. Conclusion The SSC panel issued evidence-based recommendations to help support key stakeholders caring for adults with sepsis or septic shock and their families.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
斯文败类应助lion_wei采纳,获得20
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
小白白发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
tomorrow完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
帕尔哈提发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科目三应助豆豆采纳,获得30
10秒前
12秒前
高挑的未来完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
东风应助sxy采纳,获得10
13秒前
Ava应助帕尔哈提采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
lion_wei发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
kelaier发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
心心子完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
27秒前
jerry完成签到,获得积分20
27秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
浮游应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
小马甲应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
合适尔风完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
洁净的慕山完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
科研通AI6.2应助Chip采纳,获得50
31秒前
33秒前
平凡完成签到,获得积分0
35秒前
天天快乐应助million采纳,获得10
37秒前
37秒前
heiehi发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
40秒前
黄方涛完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
梁雨辰完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
Invited Discussant 63O and 64O 1000
Dr. Dirk Wiechmann on Lingual Orthodontics: Part I 888
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
化工技术经济第五版电子版 500
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6879829
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8579703
关于积分的说明 18229251
捐赠科研通 6262288
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3054790
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2064678
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2032471