Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021

医学 感染性休克 拯救脓毒症运动 麻醉学 败血症 重症监护医学 分级(工程) 循证医学 梅德林 循证实践 严重败血症 最佳实践 复苏 替代医学 急诊医学 外科 病理 管理 法学 经济 土木工程 工程类 政治学
作者
Laura Evans,Andrew Rhodes,Waleed Alhazzani,Massimo Antonelli,Craig M. Coopersmith,Craig French,Flávia Ribeiro Machado,Lauralyn McIntyre,Marlies Ostermann,Hallie C. Prescott,Christa Schorr,Steven Q. Simpson,W. Joost Wiersinga,Fayez Alshamsi,Derek C. Angus,Yaseen M. Arabi,Luciano César Pontes Azevedo,Richard Beale,Gregory J. Beilman,Emilie P. Belley‐Côté
出处
期刊:Intensive Care Medicine [Springer Nature]
卷期号:47 (11): 1181-1247 被引量:4403
标识
DOI:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
摘要

Background Sepsis poses a global threat to millions of lives. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations on the recognition and management of sepsis and its complications. Methods We formed a panel of 60 experts from 22 countries and 11 members of the public. The panel prioritized questions that are relevant to the recognition and management of sepsis and septic shock in adults. New questions and sections were addressed, relative to the previous guidelines. These questions were grouped under 6 subgroups (screening and early treatment, infection, hemodynamics, ventilation, additional therapies, and long-term outcomes and goals of care). With input from the panel and methodologists, professional medical librarians performed the search strategy tailored to either specific questions or a group of relevant questions. A dedicated systematic review team performed screening and data abstraction when indicated. For each question, the methodologists, with input from panel members, summarized the evidence assessed and graded the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The panel generated recommendations using the evidence-to-decision framework. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of best practice statements. When evidence was insufficient to support a recommendation, the panel was surveyed to generate “in our practice” statements. Results The SSC panel issued 93 statements: 15 best practice statements, 15 strong recommendations, and 54 weak recommendations and no recommendation was provided for 9 questions. The recommendations address several important clinical areas related to screening tools, acute resuscitation strategies, management of fluids and vasoactive agents, antimicrobials and diagnostic tests and the use of additional therapies, ventilation management, goals of care, and post sepsis care. Conclusion The SSC panel issued evidence-based recommendations to help support key stakeholders caring for adults with sepsis or septic shock and their families.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
000发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
姜小时完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Jasper应助听春风采纳,获得10
2秒前
面条发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
轻松的烤鸡完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
在水一方应助joker采纳,获得10
3秒前
南尧z完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Feng223关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
PhD_HanWu完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
遆思畅关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
夕沫完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
FashionBoy应助gyl采纳,获得10
9秒前
甜甜奇迹发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
joker完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
懒得想完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
10秒前
lamica完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
xiaofeidiao完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
务实寒风完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
Ethan完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
Summer发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
华西招生版完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
光亮凌珍发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
浮游应助雷锋采纳,获得10
21秒前
尾巴完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
joker发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
aluan发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
甜甜奇迹完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
2025-2031全球及中国金刚石触媒粉行业研究及十五五规划分析报告 6000
Real World Research, 5th Edition 680
Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo By Jenine Beekhuyzen, Pat Bazeley · 2024 660
Superabsorbent Polymers 600
Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security in Asia 555
Between high and low : a chronology of the early Hellenistic period 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5675929
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4950486
关于积分的说明 15155598
捐赠科研通 4835289
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2589953
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1543753
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1501384