医学
血管抑制剂
糖尿病性黄斑水肿
眼科
氟辛醇酮
曲安奈德
贝伐单抗
黄斑水肿
黄斑变性
糖尿病性视网膜病变
皮质类固醇
地塞米松
眼压
视力
糖尿病
阿柏西普
内科学
化疗
内分泌学
作者
Justis P. Ehlers,Steven Yeh,Maureen G. Maguire,Justine R. Smith,Prithvi Mruthyunjaya,Nieraj Jain,Leo A. Kim,Christina Y. Weng,Christina J. Flaxel,Scott D. Schoenberger,Stephen J. Kim
出处
期刊:Ophthalmology
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2021-08-23
卷期号:129 (1): 88-99
被引量:64
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.07.009
摘要
To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and intravitreal corticosteroid pharmacotherapies for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).Literature searches were last conducted on May 13, 2020, in the PubMed database with no date restrictions and limited to articles published in English. The combined searches yielded 230 citations, of which 108 were reviewed in full text. Of these, 31 were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and were assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist.Only the 21 articles with level I evidence were included in this assessment. Seventeen articles provided level I evidence for 1 or more anti-VEGF pharmacotherapies, including ranibizumab (14), aflibercept (5), and bevacizumab (2) alone or in combination with other treatments for DME. Level I evidence was identified in 7 articles on intravitreal corticosteroid therapy for treatment of DME: triamcinolone (1), dexamethasone (4), and fluocinolone acetonide (2).Review of the available literature indicates that intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents and corticosteroids are efficacious treatments for DME. Elevated intraocular pressure and cataract progression are important potential complications of corticosteroid therapy. Further evidence is required to assess the comparative efficacy of these therapies. Given the limited high-quality comparative efficacy data, choice of therapy must be individualized for each patient and broad therapeutic access for patients is critical to maximize outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI