已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY (LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC) AND OPEN SURGERY IN THE TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER: A LITERATURE REVIEW

作者
Brenda Stefanello Golart,Mariana Carvalho Murari,Cecília Stoppa Cavalheiro,Melissa Alves Aires Marques,Arthur Carvalho de Souza,Bárbara Rezende Marciano,Vittoria Lourdes Geron,Letícia Wendel Madeira de Jesus,Carla Matos Vieira Borges,Bianca Thiengo Guimarães,Júlia Maria Dantas Costa Duarte,Josenil Bezerra Nascimento Neto
出处
期刊:International Journal of Health Science 卷期号:3 (50): 2-7
标识
DOI:10.22533/at.ed.1593502307077
摘要

Objective: To evaluate and compare the results of minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic and robotic) and open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer in adult patients, in order to determine which approach is more effective in terms of safety, oncological effectiveness and post recovery time.-operative.Methodology: A literature review was carried out through searches in the PubMed and SciELO databases.1423 articles were found, of which 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected to compose the analysis.Result: The different types of studies analyzed indicate that there are no significant differences between minimally invasive surgical approaches (laparoscopic and robotic) and open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer, when considering criteria such as overall and disease-free survival rate.Likewise, both techniques do not present significant differences in relation to positive resection margins.However, there were studies with discordant results regarding the number of positive lymph nodes, where one of them found no differences, while another showed a higher success rate in laparoscopic surgery.Minimally invasive surgery results in lower rates of postoperative complications, reduced length of stay, earlier return of bowel function, less impact on the immune system, and shorter recovery time compared to open surgery, although it is more expensive and has a prolonged surgical time.In addition, minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic techniques were compared, with laparoscopy showing a lower incidence of incisional hernia, and robotics showing better preservation of anorectal function.However, both minimally invasive techniques did not show significant differences regarding the overall survival rate.Conclusion: Laparotomy is a highly invasive technique and presents a high risk of postoperative complications.New less invasive techniques, such as laparoscopy

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Emper完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
疯狂的剑成完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
打打应助ClancyJacky采纳,获得10
3秒前
顺心的高山完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.4应助可爱沛蓝采纳,获得80
4秒前
bkagyin应助溜溜采纳,获得10
4秒前
Wenky完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
能干的馒头完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
喜悦的幻嫣完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ytn发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Slhy完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助结实初翠采纳,获得10
12秒前
xky3371发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
科目三应助寒梦难敌采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
15秒前
15秒前
柒末仙发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
科科1007发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
番茄土司发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
conwells发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
NexusExplorer应助Sorenzo采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
贺华完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
科研通AI6.4应助cavakq采纳,获得10
22秒前
24秒前
农民饭发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
29秒前
30秒前
SKF完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
斯文败类应助柒末仙采纳,获得10
31秒前
脑洞疼应助虚幻的冬瓜采纳,获得10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7758961
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9304735
关于积分的说明 20282599
捐赠科研通 7342906
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3312365
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462997
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2326330