The efficacy and safety of thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents in spine surgery: a protocol for systematic review and meta- analysis

医学 科克伦图书馆 系统回顾 协议(科学) 止血剂 梅德林 荟萃分析 止血 数据提取 不利影响 循证医学 重症监护医学 外科 替代医学 药理学 内科学 病理 法学 政治学
作者
Qiujiang Li,Umar YangMasood,Zhuang Zhang,Ganjun Feng,Huiliang Yang,Yueming Song
出处
期刊:Research Square - Research Square
标识
DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2674772/v1
摘要

Abstract Introduction As hemostasis is a complex process that bleeding can be difficult to control, higher requirements are needed for spinal surgeons in intraoperative hemostasis. Floseal and Surgiflo are two common thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents. Nevertheless, Floseal or Surgiflo has not been universally recommended by the current guidelines of preoperative hemostatic management in spine surgery due to lack of relative systematic evidence-based medical evidence. Moreover, adverse effects of novel absorbable hemostatic biomaterial may be poorly reported and inconsistently described. Meanwhile, there is currently no systematic review and meta-analyses available which sum up the existing evidence. Our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents in spine surgery, and to provide corresponding evidence-based medical evidence. Methods and analysis Our study will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of thrombin-based flowable hemostatic agents in spine surgery, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P). Two authors will retrieve the relevant articles using the eight databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and CBM) from inception to 16st Aug, 2022. Three authors will screen citation titles and abstracts and evaluated full-text of each potentially relevant citation, and then extract the data using a data extraction form. Any discrepancies in decisions between reviewers will be resolved through discussion. All included studies will be evaluated for quality and risk of bias according to the Cochrane guidelines. A subgroup analysis and a sensitivity analysis will be used to find the main source of between-study heterogeneity. All data analysis will be performed using RevMan v.5.3 Software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
所所应助阿渺采纳,获得10
刚刚
kkk发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
potato完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助hky采纳,获得10
3秒前
Owen应助刘雨森采纳,获得10
3秒前
丘比特应助哈里鹿呀采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
不留行完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
坦率的小天鹅应助喜悦靳采纳,获得10
6秒前
ccm发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Mississippiecho完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
桐桐应助野山采纳,获得10
8秒前
晴栀发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
科研通AI5应助gslsx409采纳,获得10
10秒前
Joy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
科研通AI5应助乐乘采纳,获得10
15秒前
村长热爱美丽完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
科目三应助lily采纳,获得30
18秒前
19秒前
沐雨篱边完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
西格完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
科研通AI5应助海藻采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
自信安荷完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
宇航发布了新的文献求助30
25秒前
hualin发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
potato关注了科研通微信公众号
26秒前
26秒前
zele女士发布了新的文献求助30
26秒前
Joy发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
Mob发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
无辜的猎豹完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
30秒前
我下班了蟹老板完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
高分求助中
Thinking Small and Large 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Visceral obesity is associated with clinical and inflammatory features of asthma: A prospective cohort study 300
Getting Published in SSCI Journals: 200+ Questions and Answers for Absolute Beginners 300
Engineering the boosting of the magnetic Purcell factor with a composite structure based on nanodisk and ring resonators 240
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3838391
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3380670
关于积分的说明 10515477
捐赠科研通 3100271
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1707439
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 821718
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 772907