Combination Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and Radiotherapy for Thyroid Cancer: Dosimetry-Driven Precision Medicine.
作者
Ian R. Marsh,Harry Quon,Prasanna Santhanam,Hao Wang,Martin A. Lodge,S. DiPasquale,Melvin Reinhardt,Dana B. Kaplin,Bin He,Michael Ghaly,Hanfei Qi,Paul W. Ladenson,George Sgouros,Robert F. Hobbs
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health] 日期:2026-02-02卷期号:67 (2): 253-261
Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) of patients with differentiated metastatic thyroid cancer has been standard treatment for more than 80 y. A high and uniform expression of the NaI symporter in malignant thyroid cells results in tumoricidal absorbed doses (ADs) delivered by the β-particle emissions of the radioactive iodine (131I). Treatment is less effective for patients whose disease exhibits reduced or variable expression of NaI symporter. Methods: We have investigated a treatment strategy that combines radioiodine with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with low 131I uptake. By combining the AD delivered by the RPT agent with that delivered by EBRT, we achieve the targeted tumoricidal AD (80 Gy 2-Gy equieffective dose) while maintaining safe normal-organ AD. A tracer administration of RPT is used to calculate a patient-specific administered activity (AA) for therapy that yields organ-at-risk ADs below toxicity thresholds. The tumor and relevant organ-at-risk ADs from the therapeutic administration are calculated and provided to the radiation oncology medical physicists for combination therapy planning. We illustrate this precision-medicine approach to treating thyroid cancer patients using data from the first 5 patients in our ongoing clinical trial. Results: A precision-medicine approach gave an AA ranging from 14.3 to 19.5 GBq. Combined RPT-EBRT therapy of the selected lesions yielded doses ranging from 73 to 147 Gy. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the feasibility of combined RPT-EBRT in thyroid cancer patients with reduced radioiodine uptake when a standard AA of 5.55 GBq (150 mCi) would have delivered a much lower AD to lesions, less likely to lead to a response. There is considerable patient variability in clearance kinetics. Clinical benefit assessment in adjusting AA on the basis of a precision methodology would require a multicenter trial.