Study on Short-circuit current interruption characteristics of Double-break fast vacuum circuit breaker within the minimum arcing time

It is significant for circuit breakers to expel a short-circuit fault in a short time for the new power grid with high proportional photovoltaic or wind power plants to achieve high transient operating stability. Compared with a traditional circuit breaker, a fast vacuum circuit breaker (FVCB), operated by an electromagnetic repulsion actuator, has an extremely shorter opening time and lower deviation in their opening times. This potentially contributes the FVCBs to interrupting a short-circuit fault current in the first half-wave when introducing a controlled switching technology. Meanwhile, it is beneficial to improve the short-circuit current breaking capacity of the FVCBs by adopting series-connected double-break circuit breaker technologies. This paper aims to explore short-circuit current interruption characteristics of a double-break FVCB within the minimum arcing time. We performed a series of short-circuit current interruption tests in a Weil synthetic test circuit. Two series-connected FVCBs and independent single-break FVCBs were used. Three different kinds of opening velocities were adopted for each of the FVCBs. Results showed that the increase in opening velocity resulted in both a decrease in the minimum arcing time and the critical arc extinguishing contact gap, whether for the single-break or the double-break interruption tests. The ratio of the shared voltage on each of the series-connected FVCBs was about 54 (for the break on the high-voltage side) and 9 (for the break on the low-voltage side). Taking the break with a shorter opening time as a break in the high-voltage side could reduce the minimum arcing time and the critical arc extinguishing contact gap. At the same opening velocity, the sum of the critical arc extinguishing contact gap of the two breaks in double-break interruption tests was significantly higher than twice the critical arc extinguishing contact gap in the single-break interruption tests. This could be caused by the fact that in double-break interruption tests, after the breakdown of one break, even if the break restored insulation, could not share the transient recovery voltage (TRV) before the break broke down. In addition, the sudden drop of TRV without breakdown occurred for the break on the high-voltage side might correlate with the micro-discharge of the vacuum gap. The interaction of the charged particles with the electrode surface would be responsible for the formation and evolution of the micro-discharge in some successful interruption cases.