糖尿病酮症酸中毒
医学
连续血糖监测
1型糖尿病
四分位间距
血糖性
糖尿病
胰岛素
血糖自我监测
低血糖
代谢控制分析
内科学
内分泌学
作者
Magdalena M. Bogun,Chunhui Wang,Paul A. Kurlansky,Nur Bedeir,Guillermo E. Umpierrez
标识
DOI:10.1177/19322968251316887
摘要
BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are increasingly used in critical and non-critical care hospital units. The efficacy of CGM in assessing glucose control in adults with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is unknown. METHODS: This single-center pilot study compared glycemic control by real-time CGM (Dexcom G6), capillary point-of-care (POC), and basic metabolic panel (BMP) during intravenous (IV) insulin treatment and after the resolution of DKA. We compared the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), median absolute relative difference (ARD) glucose values, and Diabetes Technology Society (DTS) Error Grid analyses. RESULTS: We recruited 52 patients (49 ± 19 years, admission glucose: 503 ± 239.4 mg/dL) with type 1 diabetes (n = 24) and type 2 diabetes (n = 28). Compared with POC testing, the MARD was 17.4% ± 13.2%, and the median ARD was 14.2% (interquartile range [IQR]: 6.4, 28) during the initial IV insulin period and 19.8% ± 18.7% and 14.3% (7, 26.2) after DKA resolution. The DTS Error Grid analysis showed that 100% of values during the IV insulin treatment and 95% after the DKA resolution were in zones A+B. Compared with BMP glucose values, the MARD and median ARD were 18.5% ± 19.1% and 12.2% (5.4, 23.8) during the IV insulin treatment and 22.5% ± 24.7% and 15.1% (6.6, 27.6) after DKA resolution. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on the use of real-time CGM in adults with DKA. Our study indicates that CGM technology is a reliable tool for hospital use during acute insulin treatment and after the resolution of DKA. Future multicentre randomized studies are needed to determine the benefits of real-time CGM in facilitating diabetes care in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemic crises.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI