默许
质量(理念)
比例(比率)
心理学
评定量表
计量经济学
产量(工程)
数据质量
项目反应理论
统计
社会心理学
数学
心理测量学
政治学
营销
地理
认识论
业务
公制(单位)
哲学
材料科学
地图学
政治
法学
冶金
作者
Mélanie Revilla,Willem E. Saris,Jon A. Krosnick
标识
DOI:10.1177/0049124113509605
摘要
Although agree–disagree (AD) rating scales suffer from acquiescence response bias, entail enhanced cognitive burden, and yield data of lower quality, these scales remain popular with researchers due to practical considerations (e.g., ease of item preparation, speed of administration, and reduced administration costs). This article shows that if researchers want to use AD scales, they should offer 5 answer categories rather than 7 or 11, because the latter yield data of lower quality. This is shown using data from four multitrait-multimethod experiments implemented in the third round of the European Social Survey. The quality of items with different rating scale lengths were computed and compared.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI