指导
跨度(工程)
知识管理
心理学
过程(计算)
定性性质
控制(管理)
应用心理学
社会心理学
计算机科学
管理
过程管理
业务
工程类
人工智能
经济
土木工程
心理治疗师
机器学习
操作系统
出处
期刊:Organization Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2001-08-01
卷期号:12 (4): 468-483
被引量:262
标识
DOI:10.1287/orsc.12.4.468.10636
摘要
There is a rich debate in organizational theory about the contribution of supervisors to group process and performance, and about the span of control needed to make that contribution. In this paper, I summarize the debate and develop competing hypotheses. These competing hypotheses are tested using multisite survey and archival measures, and interpreted using qualitative data from the same study. I find that small supervisory spans improve performance through their positive effects on group process. In particular, supervisors with smaller spans achieved higher levels of relational coordination among their direct reports. Qualitative data suggest that supervisors with smaller spans achieved these results through working with, and providing intensive coaching and feedback to their direct reports.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI