What Is Taught Versus What Is Learned: Health Advocacy in Specialist Graduate Medical Education

课程 清晰 医学教育 主题分析 专业 定性研究 心理学 医学 教育学 社会学 家庭医学 生物化学 社会科学 化学
作者
Yvonne Ying,Maria Athina Martimianakis,Brett Schrewe
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:100 (10): 1203-1209 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000006074
摘要

Abstract Purpose Health advocacy (HA) is a key component of competency frameworks in many global jurisdictions, yet how HA is taught is not well defined, particularly in specialty graduate medical education. This study explored how residents in these programs came to understand what HA is, what activities it entails, and what importance it carries. Method This qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews of 39 specialty residents from 2 universities (University of Toronto and University of Ottawa) from July 2019 to June 2023. A reflexive thematic analysis was used, with sensitizing concepts of the formal, informal, and hidden curricula and the CanMEDS health advocate role to construct themes from this data set. Results Most trainees struggled to define what HA means, what good HA should look like, and which kinds of activities it signifies. The lack of definitional clarity meant that many non-HA activities became conflated with HA, particularly research and quality improvement. Few could recall clear formal curricular content, whereas exposure in clinical training environments was highly variable. Many perceived HA activities as threats to clinical efficiency, of little interest to residency program leadership, and of minimal currency in being competitive for eventual staff positions. Self-identified advocates frequently engaged in self-censoring behaviors because they thought their programs and leaders were often not supportive of this kind of work. Conclusions Trainees struggled to understand what activities comprise HA because it was not prioritized in their programs or they encountered highly variable role modeling. Trainees who participated in HA activities experienced difficulties integrating HA into their overall clinical skill set due to a lack of institutional support. Health advocacy training requires consideration of structural and cultural reinforcements, including the adoption of curricula that integrate it with daily clinical care and address hidden curriculum effects.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.4应助916采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
李佳莹发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
包容无血完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
小二郎应助冷酷的芷蝶采纳,获得10
4秒前
牛有牛发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
大模型应助老婆婆不讲理采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
8秒前
默成发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
zwy发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
酷酷世开完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助宋宋采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
所所应助瘦瘦隶采纳,获得10
13秒前
坚强亦丝发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
lkb发布了新的文献求助20
14秒前
章屹澎完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
顾矜应助科研老周采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
小丸子发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
易三木完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
17秒前
科研通AI6.4应助916采纳,获得10
17秒前
霄泽发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
科研通AI6.2应助以念采纳,获得10
19秒前
JM完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
天涯共此时完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7765116
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9309477
关于积分的说明 20310890
捐赠科研通 7349894
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3314723
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2464118
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2329177