医学
耐受性
偏头痛
真实世界的证据
丛集性头痛
真实世界数据
临床试验
混淆
替代医学
随机对照试验
数据收集
循证医学
梅德林
重症监护医学
精神科
数据科学
外科
内科学
计算机科学
统计
数学
病理
政治学
法学
作者
Patricia Pozo‐Rosich,Nancy van Veelen,Edoardo Caronna,Gloria Vaghi,Marta Torres‐Ferrús,Britt W. H. van der Arend,Peter J. Goadsby,Messoud Ashina,Shuu‐Jiun Wang,Hans‐Christoph Diener,Cristina Tassorelli,Gisela M. Terwindt
出处
期刊:Cephalalgia
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2025-03-01
卷期号:45 (3)
标识
DOI:10.1177/03331024251318016
摘要
Real-world evidence studies are an important tool for investigating the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of treatments for headache disorders in clinical practice. These studies use data generated from routine clinical practice from a variety of sources and can help to identify unmet needs in headache care and guide new therapies, including populations not always included in randomized clinical trials of different ages, comorbidities, and concomitant stable treatments. Real-world evidence pertains to the clinical evidence surrounding the utilization, as well as the potential advantages or drawbacks of treatment, which is extracted through an analysis of real-world data. Real-world evidence studies can present unique challenges, including timing of data collection (prospective vs retrospective), data selection, data quality issues and potential biases (selection, confounding factors, etc.). The International Headache Society has developed these guidelines for optimizing the design and conduct of real-world evidence studies, and therefore the strength and reliability of their output.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI