Early (<4 weeks) versus standard (≥4 weeks) endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 置信区间 优势比 科克伦图书馆 荟萃分析 排水 队列研究 不利影响 队列 内科学 外科 危险系数 生态学 生物
作者
Daryl Ramai,Ikponmwosa Enofe,Smit Deliwala,Daniel Mozell,Antonio Facciorusso,Paraskevas Gkolfakis,Babu P. Mohan,Saurabh Chandan,Melissa Previtera,Marcello Maida,Andrea Anderloni,Douglas G. Adler,Andrew Ofosu
出处
期刊:Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:97 (3): 415-421.e5 被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.003
摘要

Background and Aims

Previous studies have demonstrated that the ideal time for drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections is 4 to 6 weeks after their development. However, some pancreatic collections, notably infected pancreatic fluid collections, require earlier drainage. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the first intervention is unclear, and consensus data are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections <4 weeks after development compared with ≥4 weeks after development.

Methods

Search strategies were developed for PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception. Outcomes of interest were technical success, defined as successful endoscopic placement of a lumen-apposing metal stent; clinical success, defined as a reduction in cystic collection size; and procedure-related adverse events. A random-effects model was used for analysis, and results are expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Six studies (630 patients) were included in our final analysis, in which 182 patients (28.9%) were enrolled in the early drainage cohort and 448 patients (71.1%) in the standard drainage cohort. The mean fluid collection size was 143.4 ± 18.8 mm for the early cohort versus 128 ± 19.7 mm for the standard cohort. Overall, technical success was equal in both cohorts. Clinical success did not favor either standard drainage or early drainage (OR, .39; 95% CI, .13-1.22; P = .11). No statistically significant differences were found in overall adverse events (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, .63-4.45; P = .31) or mortality (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, .29-4.48; P = .85). Hospital stay was longer for patients undergoing early drainage compared with standard drainage (23.7 vs 16.0 days, respectively).

Conclusions

Both early (<4 weeks) and standard (≥4 weeks) drainage of walled-off pancreatic fluid collections offer similar technical and clinical outcomes. Patients requiring endoscopic drainage should not be delayed for 4 weeks.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SSSYYY完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
明13发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
自然易形发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
9527发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
梦若浮生完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
笨笨的诗槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
lizishu应助郭子仪采纳,获得10
2秒前
小二郎应助突突突采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
阿纯完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
大力的灵雁应助郭子仪采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
Even_YE完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
李乐雯发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
LIZHEN发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
Danish完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
doudou发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
赫连志泽发布了新的文献求助30
12秒前
12秒前
cao完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
苹果青梦发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
思源应助俏皮的老城采纳,获得10
15秒前
突突突发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
杨慕陈发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
LIZHEN发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
玉儿发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
科研通AI6.4应助愉快素阴采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
BRITTLE FRACTURE IN WELDED SHIPS 1000
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
Developmental Peace: Theorizing China’s Approach to International Peacebuilding 1000
Traitements Prothétiques et Implantaires de l'Édenté total 2.0 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6132939
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7960174
关于积分的说明 16519669
捐赠科研通 5249470
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2803319
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1784404
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1655208