自治
拒绝
集合(抽象数据类型)
感知
心理学
焦点小组
工程伦理学
社会心理学
任务(项目管理)
欺骗
计算机科学
社会学
政治学
法学
工程类
系统工程
神经科学
精神分析
人类学
程序设计语言
作者
Claire Textor,Rui Zhang,Jeremy Lopez,Beau G. Schelble,Nathan J. McNeese,Guo Freeman,Richard Pak,Chad C. Tossell,Ewart J. de Visser
标识
DOI:10.1177/15553434221113964
摘要
Advancements and implementations of autonomous systems coincide with an increased concern for the ethical implications resulting from their use. This is increasingly relevant as autonomy fulfills teammate roles in contexts that demand ethical considerations. As AI teammates (ATs) enter these roles, research is needed to explore how an AT’s ethics influences human trust. This current research presents two studies which explore how an AT’s ethical or unethical behavior impacts trust in that teammate. In Study 1, participants responded to scenarios of an AT recommending actions which violated or abided by a set of ethical principles. The results suggest that ethicality perceptions and trust are influenced by ethical violations, but only ethicality depends on the type of ethical violation. Participants in Study 2 completed a focus group interview after performing a team task with a simulated AT that committed ethical violations and attempted to repair trust (apology or denial). The focus group responses suggest that ethical violations worsened perceptions of the AT and decreased trust, but it could still be trusted to perform tasks. The AT’s apologies and denials did not repair damaged trust. The studies’ findings suggest a nuanced relationship between trust and ethics and a need for further investigation into trust repair strategies following ethical violations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI