Deep learning models for ICU readmission prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 重症监护室 重症监护医学 梅德林 深度学习 人口 急诊医学 质量管理 医疗保健 重症监护 系统回顾 预测建模 人工智能 风险评估 急症护理 质量评定 病危 机器学习 质量(理念) 疾病严重程度
作者
Emanuele Koumantakis,Konstantina Remoundou,Nicoletta Colombi,Carmen Fava,Ioanna Roussaki,Alessia Visconti,Paola Berchialla
出处
期刊:Critical Care [BioMed Central]
卷期号:29 (1): 442-442 被引量:3
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13054-025-05642-x
摘要

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) readmissions are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, determining an appropriate timing of ICU discharge is critical. In this context, deep learning (DL) approaches have attracted significant attention. We conducted a systematic review of studies developing or validating DL models for ICU readmission prediction, published up to March 4th, 2025, and indexed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We summarised them along multiple dimensions, including outcome and population definition, DL architecture, reproducibility, generalizability, and explainability, and provided a meta-analytic estimate of model performance. We included 24 studies encompassing 49 DL models, predominantly trained on US-based datasets, and rarely subjected to external validation. There was considerable variability across study settings, including the definition and timeframe of the ICU readmission outcome, as well as DL architecture used, alongside a substantial risk of bias. Technical reproducibility and model interpretation were rare. A meta-analysis of AUROC values from 11 studies yielded a mean of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.72–0.84), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.9%). Models targeting disease-specific ICU subpopulations achieved significantly higher performance (mean AUROC = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89–0.95, p = 0.002), and substantially lower heterogeneity (I2 = 17.1%). DL models showed promising performances in predicting ICU readmissions, but exhibited several shortcomings, including low reproducibility, over-reliance on a few US-based datasets, and limited explainability. Additionally, the high heterogeneity and risk of bias limited our ability to assess their pooled performance through meta-analysis. Taken together, our observations suggest that the quality of the evidence regarding the application of DL approaches to ICU readmission prediction is poor, thus hindering their clinical applicability.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
英姑应助Y123采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
省静霞发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
怜熙完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
xinranlee完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
木安完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
马格完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
天天向上完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
凝霜雪完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
xh93完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
魔幻半仙完成签到 ,获得积分20
10秒前
meteor完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
风味芹菜发布了新的文献求助20
11秒前
烟花应助Scout采纳,获得10
11秒前
Oracle应助Yuanlang采纳,获得50
12秒前
情怀应助lm18994782585采纳,获得10
13秒前
Dai完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
Akim应助mym采纳,获得10
13秒前
健壮涵柳完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
pitto发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
狮子卷卷完成签到,获得积分0
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
soul发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
米月莹完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
vae完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
21秒前
共享精神应助勤恳的越泽采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
QX完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
666发布了新的文献求助30
23秒前
科研通AI6.4应助123采纳,获得10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7751211
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9298541
关于积分的说明 20247275
捐赠科研通 7333315
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309799
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461397
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2322407