清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Comparison Between the 2021 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Criteria and Other Lung Cancer Screening Criteria for Racial Disparity in Eligibility

医学 肺癌筛查 肺癌 全国肺筛查试验 内科学 癌症筛查 癌症 肿瘤科
作者
Chan Yeu Pu,Christine M. Lusk,Christine Neslund-Dudas,Shirish M. Gadgeel,Ayman O. Soubani,Ann G. Schwartz
出处
期刊:JAMA Oncology [American Medical Association]
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6720
摘要

Importance

In 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) broadened its age and smoking pack-year requirement for lung cancer screening.

Objectives

To compare the 2021 USPSTF lung cancer screening criteria with other lung cancer screening criteria and evaluate whether the sensitivity and specificity of these criteria differ by race.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study included 912 patients with lung cancer and 1457 controls without lung cancer enrolled in an epidemiology study (INHALE [Inflammation, Health, Ancestry, and Lung Epidemiology]) in the Detroit metropolitan area between May 15, 2012, and March 31, 2018. Patients with lung cancer and controls were 21 to 89 years of age; patients with lung cancer who were never smokers and controls who were never smokers were not included in these analyses. Statistical analysis was performed from August 31, 2020, to April 13, 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The study assessed whether patients with lung cancer and controls would have qualified for lung cancer screening using the 2013 USPSTF, 2021 USPSTF, and 2012 modification of the model from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCOm2012) screening criteria. Sensitivity was defined as the percentage of patients with lung cancer who qualified for screening, while specificity was defined as the percentage of controls who did not qualify for lung cancer screening.

Results

Participants included 912 patients with a lung cancer diagnosis (493 women [54%]; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [9.5] years) and 1457 control participants without lung cancer at enrollment (795 women [55%]; mean [SD] age, 60.4 [9.6] years). With the use of 2021 USPSTF criteria, 590 patients with lung cancer (65%) were eligible for screening compared with 619 patients (68%) per the PLCOm2012 criteria and 445 patients (49%) per the 2013 USPSTF criteria. With the use of 2013 USPSTF criteria, significantly more White patients than African American patients with lung cancer (324 of 625 [52%] vs 121 of 287 [42%]) would have been eligible for screening. This racial disparity was absent when using 2021 USPSTF criteria (408 of 625 [65%] White patients vs 182 of 287 [63%] African American patients) and PLCOm2012 criteria (427 of 625 [68%] White patients vs 192 of 287 [67%] African American patients). The 2013 USPSTF criteria excluded 950 control participants (65%), while the PLCOm2012 criteria excluded 843 control participants (58%), and the 2021 USPSTF criteria excluded 709 control participants (49%). The 2013 USPSTF criteria excluded fewer White control participants than African American control participants (514 of 838 [61%] vs 436 of 619 [70%]). This racial disparity is again absent when using 2021 USPSTF criteria (401 of 838 [48%] White patients vs 308 of 619 [50%] African American patients) and PLCOm2012 guidelines (475 of 838 [57%] White patients vs 368 of 619 [60%] African American patients).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that the USPSTF 2021 guideline changes improve on earlier, fixed screening criteria for lung cancer, broadening eligibility and reducing the racial disparity in access to screening.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
苗条的枕头完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
123456完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
彩色的芷容完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
超男完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
CC完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Vincent完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
充电宝应助阔达乐荷采纳,获得10
1分钟前
英俊的铭应助粗心的黑猫采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Ttimer完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
YZY完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
阔达乐荷发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
Qi完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
阔达乐荷完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
daisygogogo发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
激动的似狮完成签到,获得积分0
2分钟前
3分钟前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Jasper应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
小蘑菇应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
天天快乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
3分钟前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
共享精神应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
3分钟前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
高分求助中
Overcoming Stigma and Bias in Obesity Management 800
Malcolm Fraser : a biography 700
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Bounds for Statistical Estimation in Semiparametric Models 500
Climate change and sports: Statistics report on climate change and sports 500
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 450
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6473434
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8276674
关于积分的说明 17646876
捐赠科研通 5553365
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2909780
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1886559
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1738550