实证研究
公共价值
价值(数学)
多样性(控制论)
混乱
社会学
订单(交换)
考试(生物学)
定性研究
公共关系
管理科学
政治学
认识论
社会科学
计算机科学
经济
心理学
哲学
人工智能
古生物学
财务
机器学习
生物
精神分析
作者
Jean Hartley,John Alford,Eva Knies,Scott Douglas
标识
DOI:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192166
摘要
There is considerable scholarly writing about the theory and application of public value concepts, but this article explores why there is, by contrast, so little empirical research on public value. The article then goes on to provide a framework and a research agenda for inspiring and guiding new empirical research, based on three different conceptualizations of public value, with researchers needing to be explicit about which approach they are using in order to avoid confusion. While case studies have been used as a research method, the authors suggest a much wider array of potential research methods (depending on the research question) covering both quantitative and qualitative approaches and with a wider variety of designs, including comparative analysis. It is suggested that empirical research is undertaken with a more diverse range of stakeholders of public value, breaking out of the public manager-centric approach. This is an exciting agenda for research, though the paper warns that public value may fade from view unless empirical research is undertaken to test, challenge and extend the scholarly contributions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI