清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

1307 – Clinical Predictors Of Therapeutic Response To Clozapine In a Sample Of 42 Patients With Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia

作者
Jaâfar Nakhli,L. Ltaief,Leila Ben Amor,S. Ben Nasr,B. Ben Hadj Ali
出处
期刊:European Psychiatry [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:28 (S1)
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0924-9338(13)76365-x
摘要

Background Several lines of evidence suggest that Clozapine is more effective than others antipsychotic drugs in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). It would therefore be extremely valuable if predictors of response to Clozapine could be identified. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive factors of clinical responses to Clozapine in a group of patients with TRS. Methods We had studied 42 TRS patients (8 males and 34 females) receiving Clozapine. All patients inthis study fulfilled the criteria for refractory schizophrenia according to the UK guidelines for the for the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Psychopathology was evaluated before the initiation of Clozapine therapy and after 4 weeks using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment for Positive Symptoms (SAPS), and the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Results Of the TRS patients on Clozapine, 61.9% achieved a clinical response, defined as at least a 20% decrease in BPRS. There were no correlation between gender, age, educational level and Clozapine response. The different subtypes of schizophrenia have shown no differences in therapeutic response. There was no correlation between response and daily doses of Clozapine (relative to dose per kg of body weight). A good Clozapine response was more likely when schizophrenia began at a later age (p= 0.007) and when negative symptoms were severe (p= 0.009). Conclusion In our study 61.9% of TRS patients on Clozapine had a clinical response. Priority should be given for patients with evident negative symptom.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
钟丽完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
LXX发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
14秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小静发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
csu化学人完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
苹果完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
yuntong完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
LXX发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
39秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
44秒前
科研通AI6.2应助LXX采纳,获得10
48秒前
50秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
50秒前
小蘑菇应助小静采纳,获得10
52秒前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
Nicho完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
59秒前
宋相甫发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
呆萌的孤云完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
赘婿应助CLW采纳,获得10
1分钟前
xuan发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助开朗的骁采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
An introduction of AMSTAR-2: a quality assessment instrument of systematic reviews including randomized or non-randomized controlled trials or both 500
An introduction to a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis: AMSTAR 500
The formulation methods and steps of umbrella review 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7605505
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9181355
关于积分的说明 19662678
捐赠科研通 7179972
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3269511
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2433439
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2263619