Prenatal and perinatal risk and protective factors for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

荟萃分析 系统回顾 医学 优势比 精神科 临床心理学 精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 梅德林 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Cathy Davies,Giulia Segre,Andrés Estradé,Joaquim Raduà,Andrea De Micheli,Umberto Provenzani,Dominic Oliver,Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo,Valentina Ramella‐Cravaro,Maria Besozzi,Paola Dazzan,Maddalena Miele,Gianluigi Caputo,Cecilia Spallarossa,Georgia Crossland,Athif Ilyas,Giulia Spada,Pierluigi Politi,Robin Murray,Philip McGuire
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:7 (5): 399-410 被引量:284
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30057-2
摘要

Background Prenatal and perinatal insults are implicated in the aetiopathogenesis of psychotic disorders but the consistency and magnitude of their associations with psychosis have not been updated for nearly two decades. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of the evidence on the association between prenatal or perinatal risk and protective factors and psychotic disorders. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the Web of Science database for articles published up to July 20, 2019. We identified cohort and case-control studies examining the association (odds ratio [OR]) between prenatal and perinatal factors and any International Classification of Diseases (ICD) or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) non-organic psychotic disorder with a healthy comparison group. Other inclusion criteria were enough data available to do the analyses, and non-overlapping datasets. We excluded reviews, meta-analyses, abstracts or conference proceedings, and articles with overlapping datasets. Data were extracted according to EQUATOR and PRISMA guidelines. Extracted variables included first author, publication year, study type, sample size, type of psychotic diagnosis (non-affective psychoses or schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, affective psychoses) and diagnostic instrument (DSM or ICD and version), the risk or protective factor, and measure of association (primary outcome). We did random-effects pairwise meta-analyses, Q statistics, I2 index, sensitivity analyses, meta-regressions, and assessed study quality and publication bias. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42017079261. Findings 152 studies relating to 98 risk or protective factors were eligible for analysis. Significant risk factors were: maternal age younger than 20 years (OR 1·17) and 30–34 years (OR 1·05); paternal age younger than 20 years (OR 1·31) and older than 35 years (OR 1·28); any maternal (OR 4·60) or paternal (OR 2·73) psychopathology; maternal psychosis (OR 7·61) and affective disorder (OR 2·26); three or more pregnancies (OR 1·30); herpes simplex 2 (OR 1·35); maternal infections not otherwise specified (NOS; OR 1·27); suboptimal number of antenatal visits (OR 1·83); winter (OR 1·05) and winter to spring (OR 1·05) season of birth in the northern hemisphere; maternal stress NOS (OR 2·40); famine (OR 1·61); any famine or nutritional deficits in pregnancy (OR 1·40); maternal hypertension (OR 1·40); hypoxia (OR 1·63); ruptured (OR 1·86) and premature rupture (OR 2·29) of membranes; polyhydramnios (OR 3·05); definite obstetric complications NOS (OR 1·83); birthweights of less than 2000 g (OR 1·84), less than 2500 g (OR 1·53), or 2500–2999 g (OR 1·23); birth length less than 49 cm (OR 1·17); small for gestational age (OR 1·40); premature birth (OR 1·35), and congenital malformations (OR 2·35). Significant protective factors were maternal ages 20–24 years (OR 0·93) and 25–29 years (OR 0·92), nulliparity (OR 0·91), and birthweights 3500–3999 g (OR 0·90) or more than 4000 g (OR 0·86). The results were corrected for publication biases; sensitivity and meta-regression analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings for most factors. Interpretation Several prenatal and perinatal factors are associated with the later onset of psychosis. The updated knowledge emerging from this study could refine understanding of psychosis pathogenesis, enhance multivariable risk prediction, and inform preventive strategies. Funding None.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bvcxz完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
阿瑾完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
JianhuangChen完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Ava应助enen采纳,获得10
2秒前
Lucas应助璃月品茶钟离采纳,获得10
2秒前
研友_ZzrWKZ发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
YG-in完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
冷落清秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
星陨完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
刻苦的绿真完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
怕黑的寻菱完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
xxxxxxxxx发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
若即若离完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
英俊的一笑完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
林木木完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
CipherSage应助bocheng采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
绿豆沙完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
小王同志发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
憨憨的小于完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
birfd完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
coryyyy发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
科研通AI2S应助王化省采纳,获得10
16秒前
学无涯发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
ALEX发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
CipherSage应助liu采纳,获得10
17秒前
玉米完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
21秒前
金jin完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
21秒前
汉堡包应助kjysbw采纳,获得10
22秒前
何同学发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
demonapple12完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
过时的黄豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Cardiovascular Research and Medicine(2e) 820
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7779710
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9319987
关于积分的说明 20374428
捐赠科研通 7367275
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3319556
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2467495
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2335259