National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality recommendations: first report

睡眠(系统调用) 基础(证据) 心理学 利益相关者 质量(理念) 德尔菲法 午睡 医学 老年学 医学教育 应用心理学 公共关系 政治学 社会心理学 计算机科学 人工智能 法学 哲学 操作系统 认识论
作者
Maurice M. Ohayon,Emerson M. Wickwire,Max Hirshkowitz,Steven M. Albert,Alon Y. Avidan,Frank J. Daly,Yves Dauvilliers,Raffaele Ferri,Constance H. Fung,David Gozal,Nancy Hazen,Andrew D. Krystal,Kenneth L. Lichstein,Monica P. Mallampalli,Giuseppe Plazzi,Robert Rawding,Frank A. J. L. Scheer,Virend K. Somers,Michael V. Vitiello
出处
期刊:Sleep Health [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:3 (1): 6-19 被引量:1091
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sleh.2016.11.006
摘要

To provide evidence-based recommendations and guidance to the public regarding indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span. The National Sleep Foundation assembled a panel of experts from the sleep community and representatives appointed by stakeholder organizations (Sleep Quality Consensus Panel). A systematic literature review identified 277 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Abstracts and full-text articles were provided to the panelists for review and discussion. A modified Delphi RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 3 rounds of voting was used to determine agreement. For most of the sleep continuity variables (sleep latency, number of awakenings >5 minutes, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency), the panel members agreed that these measures were appropriate indicators of good sleep quality across the life-span. However, overall, there was less or no consensus regarding sleep architecture or nap-related variables as elements of good sleep quality. There is consensus among experts regarding some indicators of sleep quality among otherwise healthy individuals. Education and public health initiatives regarding good sleep quality will require sustained and collaborative efforts from multiple stakeholders. Future research should explore how sleep architecture and naps relate to sleep quality. Implications and limitations of the consensus recommendations are discussed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
叙白发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
阿可阿可发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
希望天下0贩的0应助Yvonne采纳,获得30
1秒前
LiLi发布了新的文献求助100
1秒前
3秒前
4秒前
smile完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Polymer完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
5秒前
落寞伯云应助下板跨栏采纳,获得10
6秒前
yyst完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
orixero应助石头采纳,获得10
6秒前
melody完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Anaero完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
糖糖发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
赘婿应助lovesxj941采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
victor1995888完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
null应助康恺采纳,获得10
12秒前
学术蔡鸡完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
郭逍遥发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
慕青应助binxman采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
ding应助sweet采纳,获得30
13秒前
Shuang完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
爆米花应助LQL采纳,获得10
14秒前
qianlan发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
学术蔡鸡发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
丘比特应助何88888888采纳,获得10
15秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助zhoushishan采纳,获得10
15秒前
16秒前
认真无极完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
火山完成签到 ,获得积分0
17秒前
怕黑晓亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7755661
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9302106
关于积分的说明 20267598
捐赠科研通 7338474
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3311226
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462314
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2324627