亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey

作者
João Paulo Souza,Cynthia Pileggi,José Guilherme Cecatti
出处
期刊:Reproductive Health [BioMed Central]
卷期号:4 (1): 3-3 被引量:85
标识
DOI:10.1186/1742-4755-4-3
摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to assure high methodological standards, systematic reviews may be affected by publication bias. The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of publication bias in a collection of high quality systematic reviews on reproductive health. METHODS: Systematic reviews included in the Reproductive Health Library (RHL), issue No 9, were assessed. Funnel plot was used to assess meta-analyses containing 10 or more trials reporting a binary outcome. A funnel plot, the estimated number of missing studies and the adjusted combined effect size were obtained using the "trim and fill method". Meta-analyses results that were not considered to be robust due to a possible publication bias were submitted to a more detailed assessment. RESULTS: A total of 21 systematic reviews were assessed. The number of trials comprising each one ranged from 10 to 83 (median = 13), totaling 379 trials, whose results have been summarized. None of the reviews had reported any evaluation of publication bias or funnel plot asymmetry. Some degree of asymmetry in funnel plots was observed in 18 of the 21 meta-analyses evaluated (85.7%), with the estimated number of missing studies ranging from 1 to 18 (median = 3). Only for three meta-analyses, the conclusion could not be considered robust due to a possible publication bias. CONCLUSION: Asymmetry is a frequent finding in funnel plots of meta-analyses in reproductive health, but according to the present evaluation, less than 15% of meta-analyses report conclusions that would not be considered robust. Publication bias and other sources of asymmetry in funnel plots should be systematically addressed by reproductive health meta-analysts. Next amendments in Cochrane systematic reviews should include this type of evaluation. Further studies regarding the evolution of effect size and publication bias over time in systematic reviews in reproductive health are needed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
欢喜的颜发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
14秒前
16秒前
黑球发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
斯文败类应助欢喜的颜采纳,获得10
32秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
野性的苗条完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
1分钟前
内向鸣凤完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
自由月亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
慕青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2分钟前
清脆的芒果完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
meeteryu完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
22222完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
陈大宝发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
昏睡的碧菡完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
4分钟前
明亮访梦完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
wy完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Benhnhk21完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
安静的代曼完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
科研通AI6.2应助小美采纳,获得10
5分钟前
迅速的柚子完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
精明夜安完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
6分钟前
欢喜的不平完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
雾色笼晓树苍完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
MchemG应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
欣慰小夏完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
suge完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
7分钟前
从容的威发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
safari完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
典雅的念梦完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
大写的LV发布了新的文献求助30
7分钟前
从容的威完成签到,获得积分20
7分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Art Therapy and Career Counseling 600
The Oxford Handbook of Digital Classical Studies 550
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
The Analytical and Numerical Solution of Electric and Magnetic Fields 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7619377
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9194843
关于积分的说明 19706211
捐赠科研通 7191245
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3272394
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2435028
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2267622