医学
心脏病学
内科学
房室传导阻滞
心室起搏
块(置换群论)
心脏起搏
血流动力学
心脏传导阻滞
心力衰竭
心电图
心室功能
室性心动过速
作者
Zhiyong Qian,Lingyun Jiang,Xiaofeng Hou,Xiaolin Xue,Min Shen,Yangang Su,Yangxin Chen,Binni Cai,Lang He,Jie Fan,Fayuan Fu,Marek Jastrzębski,Shengwen Yang,Joseph Yat‐Sun Chan,Weijian Huang,Zachary I. Whinnett,Xia Sheng,Mihail Gabriel Chelu,Yuanning Xu,Yao Wang
标识
DOI:10.1056/nejmoa2612972
摘要
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular pacing is associated with cardiac dyssynchrony and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Left bundle-branch pacing preserves left ventricular electrical and mechanical synchrony, but its clinical benefits relative to right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block remain unclear. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, international, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with atrioventricular block in a 1:1 ratio to receive left bundle-branch pacing or right ventricular pacing. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, hospitalization for heart failure, or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: A total of 702 patients underwent randomization, with 348 assigned to receive left bundle-branch pacing and 354 to receive right ventricular pacing; 17 patients (6 in the left bundle-branch pacing group and 11 in the right ventricular pacing group) were excluded before device implantation. A total of 685 patients (342 in the left bundle-branch pacing group and 343 in the right ventricular pacing group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of the patients was 68.4 years, and 57.5% were men. At the prespecified interim analysis, the data monitoring committee recommended early termination of the trial. At a median follow-up of 35.1 months (interquartile range, 23.6 to 40.7), a primary-outcome event had occurred in 16 patients in the left bundle-branch pacing group and in 35 patients in the right ventricular pacing group (Kaplan-Meier 4-year cumulative incidence, 8.5% and 19.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.75; P = 0.003 by a stratified log-rank test). Serious adverse events unrelated to implantation procedures occurred in 39 patients (11.8%) who had received left bundle-branch pacing and in 33 patients (9.3%) who had received right ventricular pacing (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with atrioventricular block, left bundle-branch pacing was superior to right ventricular pacing in reducing the risk of a composite of death from any cause, hospitalization for heart failure, or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. (Funded by Project on New Technology of Jiangsu Province and others; OptimPacing ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04624763.).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI