左炔诺孕酮
氨甲环酸
炔诺酮
医学
月经出血
产科
随机对照试验
妇科
醋酸炔诺酮
计划生育
雌激素
研究方法
人口
内科学
外科
失血
环境卫生
作者
Mine Kiseli,Fulya Kayıkçıoğlu,Özlem Evliyaoğlu,Alı Haberal
摘要
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Our aim was to compare the therapeutic efficacies of norethisterone acid (NETA), tranexamic acid and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in treating idiopathic heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Women with heavy uterine bleeding were randomized to receive NETA, tranexamic acid or LNG-IUS for 6 months. The primary outcome was a decrease in menstrual bleeding as assessed by pictorial blood loss assessment charts and hematological parameters analyzed at the 1st, 3rd and 6th months. Health-related quality of life (QOL) variables were also recorded and analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in each treatment group, but the results of only 62 were evaluated. NETA, tranexamic acid, and LNG-IUS reduced menstrual blood loss (MBL) by 53.1, 60.8, and 85.8%, respectively, at the 6th month. LNG-IUS was more effective than NETA and tranexamic acid in decreasing MBL. LNG-IUS was also more efficient than tranexamic acid in correcting anemia related to menorrhagia. Satisfaction rates were comparable among the NETA (70%), tranexamic acid (63%) and LNG-IUS (77%) groups. QOL in physical aspects increased significantly in the tranexamic acid and LNG-IUS groups. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The positive effect of LNG-IUS on QOL parameters, as well as its high efficacy, makes it a first-line option for HMB.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI