Ghostwriters in the machine: Openly appreciating AI tools and humans who helped us

Journal of Organizational BehaviorVolume 45, Issue 2 p. 155-158 EDITORIAL Ghostwriters in the machine: Openly appreciating AI tools and humans who helped us Marie T. Dasborough, Corresponding Author Marie T. Dasborough [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-5119 Miami Herbert Business School, Department of Management, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA Correspondence Marie T. Dasborough, Miami Herbert Business School, Department of Management, University of Miami, 5250 University Drive, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Marie T. Dasborough, Corresponding Author Marie T. Dasborough [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-5119 Miami Herbert Business School, Department of Management, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA Correspondence Marie T. Dasborough, Miami Herbert Business School, Department of Management, University of Miami, 5250 University Drive, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 12 February 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2778 Funding information: There is no funding. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT There is no conflict of interest. REFERENCES Ayinde, L., Wibowo, M. P., Ravuri, B., & Emdad, F. B. (2023). ChatGPT as an important tool in organizational management: A review of the literature. Business Information Review, 40(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/02663821231187991 10.1177/02663821231187991 Google Scholar Berg, J. M., Raj, M., & Seamans, R. (2023). Capturing value from artificial intelligence. Academy of Management Discoveries, 9(4), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2023.0106 10.5465/amd.2023.0106 Google Scholar Dasborough, M. T. (2023). Awe-inspiring advancements in AI: The impact of ChatGPT on the field of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2695 10.1002/job.2695 Web of Science®Google Scholar Gagné, M., Tian, A. W., Soo, C., Zhang, B., Ho, K. S. B., & Hosszu, K. (2019). Different motivations for knowledge sharing and hiding: The role of motivating work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2364 10.1002/job.2364 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hanek, K. J., Garcia, S. M., & Tor, A. (2016). Gender and competitive preferences: The role of competition size. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1122–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000112 10.1037/apl0000112 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Harzing, A.W. (2007) Publish or perish, available from https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish Google Scholar Leavitt, K., Schabram, K., Hariharan, P., & Barnes, C. M. (2021). Ghost in the machine: On organizational theory in the age of machine learning. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 750–777. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0247 10.5465/amr.2019.0247 Web of Science®Google Scholar Lindebaum, D., & Ashraf, M. (2023). The ghost in the machine, or the ghost in organizational theory? A complementary view on the use of machine learning. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0036 10.5465/amr.2021.0036 Web of Science®Google Scholar Lindebaum, D., & Fleming, P. (2023). ChatGPT undermines human reflexivity, scientific responsibility and responsible management research. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12781 10.1111/1467-8551.12781 Web of Science®Google Scholar Locklear, L. R., Sheridan, S., & Kong, D. T. (2023). Appreciating social science research on gratitude: An integrative review for organizational scholarship on gratitude in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2624 10.1002/job.2624 Web of Science®Google Scholar Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Steel, P., Beugelsdijk, S., & Aguinis, H. (2021). The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00385-z 10.1057/s41267-020-00385-z Web of Science®Google Scholar Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857 Web of Science®Google Scholar Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Wilkinson, C. (2020). Imposter syndrome and the accidental academic: An autoethnographic account. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1762087 10.1080/1360144X.2020.1762087 Web of Science®Google Scholar Volume45, Issue2Special Issue:The Job Annual Review and Conceptual Development IssueFebruary 2024Pages 155-158 ReferencesRelatedInformation