Long-Term Effects of Forest Management on Boreal Forest Soil Organic Carbon

Boreal forests have historically been regarded as some of the largest terrestrial carbon (C) sinks. However, increased soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition due to forest harvesting and post-harvest silviculture (e.g., site preparation, planting, and managing for competing vegetation) may exacerbate the effects of climate warming and shift boreal forests from being C sinks to C sources. We used an established stand-scale, fully replicated, experimental study to identify how two levels of forest management (harvesting = Harvest Only, and harvesting with post-harvest silviculture = Harvest Plus) influence SOC dynamics at three boreal forest sites varying in soil texture. Each site was surveyed for forest floor (litter and F/H horizons) and mineral soils pre-harvest (0) and 5, 14, and 20 years post-harvest. We predicted that sites harvested and left to revegetate naturally would have the lowest SOC stocks after 20 years, as sites that were planted and managed for competing vegetation would recover faster and contribute to a larger nutrient pool, and that the sand-dominated site would have the largest SOC losses following harvest due to the inherently lower ability of sand soils to chemically and/or physically protect SOC from decomposition following harvest. Over a 20-year period, both forest management treatments generally resulted in reduced total (litter, F/H, and mineral horizon) SOC stocks compared with the control: the Harvest Only treatment reduced overall SOC stocks by 15% at the silt-dominated site and 31% at the clay-dominated site but increased overall SOC stocks by 4% at the sand-dominated site, whereas the Harvest Plus treatment reduced overall SOC stocks by 32% at the sand- and silt-dominated sites and 5% at the clay-dominated site. This suggests that harvesting and leaving plots to revegetate naturally on sand-dominated sites and harvesting followed by post-harvest silviculture on clay-dominated sites may minimize total SOC losses at similar sites, though a full replicated field experiment is needed to test this hypothesis. Most treatment effects in this study were observed only in the second decade post-harvest (14 and 20 years post-harvest), highlighting the importance of long-term field experiments on the effects of forest harvesting and post-harvest silviculture. This research improves our understanding of the relationship between C dynamics, forest management, and soil texture, which is integral for developing sustainable management strategies that optimize C sequestration and contribute to the resilience of boreal forest ecosystems in the face of climate change.