The Promising Seesaw Relationship Between Activity and Stability of Ru‐Based Electrocatalysts for Acid Oxygen Evolution and Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis

Abstract The development of electrocatalysts that are not reliant on iridium for efficient acid‐oxygen evolution is a critical step towards the proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) and green hydrogen industry. Ruthenium‐based electrocatalysts have garnered widespread attention due to their remarkable catalytic activity and lower commercial price. However, the challenge lies in balancing the seesaw relationship between activity and stability of these electrocatalysts during the acid‐oxygen evolution reaction (OER). This review delves into the progress made in Ru‐based electrocatalysts with regards to acid OER and PEMWE applications. It highlights the significance of customizing the acidic OER mechanism of Ru‐based electrocatalysts through the coordination of adsorption evolution mechanism (AEM) and lattice oxygen oxidation mechanism (LOM) to attain the ideal activity and stability relationship. The promising tradeoffs between the activity and stability of different Ru‐based electrocatalysts, including Ru metals and alloys, Ru single‐atomic materials, Ru oxides, and derived complexes, and Ru‐based heterojunctions, as well as their applicability to PEMWE systems, are discussed in detail. Furthermore, this paper offers insights on in situ control of Ru active sites, dynamic catalytic mechanism, and commercial application of PEMWE. Based on three‐way relationship between cost, activity, and stability, the perspectives and development are provided.